Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
Pattayan Sreekanth S/o A.P. Kunhiraman – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case and prosecution background. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding evidence of conspiracy. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis of conspiracy evidence. (Para 8 , 30) |
| 4. legal principles of conspiracy under ipc. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. assessment of the appellant's involvement in conspiracy. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 6. final judgment and acquittal of the appellant. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
This appeal is at the instance of the 2nd accused in C.C.No.36 of 2002 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode. The appellant impugns conviction and sentence imposed against him in the said case dated 26.11.2009. The respondent herein is the State of Kerala represented by the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (`VACB’ for short).
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant/accused as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor for VACB.
3. Perused the verdicts impugned as well as the records of the Special Court.
4. The prosecution case is that the 1st accused while working as Village Officer, Thirunelly from 01.07.1992 to 30.04.1996 being a public servant abused his official position, hatched criminal conspiracy with th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
