IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
Muhammad Shareef. C s/o. Moosan Haji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Local Self Government Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal issues regarding the second marriage registration subjected to prior marriage. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the implications of not notifying the first wife when registering a second marriage. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. registration procedures and legal precedents governing marriage validity. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. the necessity for dismissing petitions when relevant parties are not included. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT :
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
1. A legal conundrum arises in this case regarding the registration of a Muslim man's second marriage, in accordance with the Kerala Registration of Marriages (Common) Rules 2008 (hereinafter referred to as Rules 2008), when his first marriage to another woman is in existence. Whether notice is necessary to the first wife for the purpose of registering the second marriage before the Local Self Government Institutions in accordance with the Rules 2008 is the first question to be decided. In such a situation, if the first wife objects to the registration of the second marriage, stating that the second marriage is invalid, what is the remedy for the husband? This is the next question to be decided.
2. I will narrate the facts in this case first: The 1st



Pranav A. M. & another v. Secretary, Engandiyur Grama Panchayat, Thrissur
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.