Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH
Anu C.R. S/o Late Ravindran – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the appeal and underlying case facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of legal representation and initial court considerations. (Para 3) |
| 3. discussion on relevant legal standards for cross-examination and document admissibility. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. judicial precedents affecting evidential objections in trials. (Para 5) |
| 5. final orders and directions issued by the court regarding the petition. (Para 9) |
ORDER :
G. GIRISH, J.
The refusal of the Additional Sessions Judge dealing with the trial of cases relating to atrocities and sexual violence against women and children, Ernakulam, to permit the defence lawyer in S.C No.1073/2022 to confront PW2 during cross-examination by showing two documents, is under challenge in this petition filed by the accused in that case under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
2. The offences alleged against the accused are rape under the false promise of marriage and cheating, coming under Section 376(2)(n) and Section 420 I.P.C respectively. One of the places where the accused allegedly indulged in sexual relationship with the survivor by giving the false promise of marriage, is the ground floor of a building which
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
