Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B.SNEHALATHA
Muhammed Ashar K. S/o Yousef – Appellant
Versus
Muhsina P.K. D/o Moosa K.T. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage details and divorce origin (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on reconciliation and mahar return (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and statements (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's reasoning on khula validity requirements (Para 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. overall ruling and conclusion (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Devan Ramachandran, J.
1. The appellant was married to the respondent on 15.12.2019 and a son was born to them on 23.04.2021.
2. However, it transpires that matrimonial strife germinated between the parties, which finally led the respondent to issue Ext.A2 “Khula Nama” dated 05.10.2023, to the appellant, thus divorcing him.
3. The respondent, thereupon, filed O.P.No.998/2023 before the learned Family Court, Thalassery, seeking declaration of her marital status as being divorced from the respondent and this has been allowed by the said Court, after recording her statement as PW1 and evaluating Exts.A1 to A6 documents produced by her.
4. The appellant - Sri.Muhammed Ashar K., appearing in person before us, assails the order of the learned Family Court primarily on two grounds, namely that: a) there was no conciliation between the parties before Ext.A2 “Khula Nam
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
