SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 3199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH
M.Sunil Kumar S/o G. Muralidharan Nair – Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : V. Premchand, Mahadev M.J.
For the Respondent: Deepu Thankan

Headnote: Read headnote

Table of Content
1. transfer disputed due to disciplinary context of ongoing complaints. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. counsel argues against punitive nature of transfer based on administrative framework. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court deliberates on punitive versus administrative transfers concerning employee misconduct. (Para 17 , 18 , 22)

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner, who is employed as Inspector in the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and working at the Vaikom Unit, has filed this writ petition seeking to quash Ext.P8 and to declare that the transfer given to him from Vaikom Depot of KSRTC to the Kattappana Depot is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top