Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU
Sajid Pasha S/o Musthafa Kamal Pasha – Appellant
Versus
Abdunnasir P. S/o Aboobakkar P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. formation and management of partnership business. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. disputes regarding accounts and arbitration position. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. respondents' objections and counterarguments. (Para 7) |
| 4. hearing of legal representatives. (Para 8) |
| 5. arguments presented by the applicants and respondents on arbitration. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. importance and legal interpretation of section 21 of the act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. judicial interpretation of disputes related to arbitration. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. notice under section 21 and its requirements. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. failure of the notice under section 21 and resulting consequences. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. conclusion of the court refusing arbitration due to procedural deficiencies. (Para 29) |
ORDER :
1. Under the name and style “M/s. Roofs and Shades” applicants and respondents 1 and 2 formed a partnership firm with equal partnership. The partnership deed was executed on 5.2.2005. A copy of the same has been produced as Annexure-A1. The 1st respondent was the Managing Partner. According to the applicants, he along with the 2nd respondent- his wife, was managing the day-to-day affairs of the firm.
A request for arbitration must clearly detail the particular dispute to satisfy Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, triggering the commencement of proceedings and the calculatio....
A partner cannot submit a dispute to arbitration without express authority from all partners, as required by Section 19(2)(a) of the Indian Partnership Act.
The main legal point established is the court's reliance on the unequivocal admission of the respondent and the presence of his signature on the Deed of Retirement to affirm the existence of the arbi....
The referral court's scope under Section 11(6-A) is limited to the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement. A formal notice under Section 21 is not mandatory if the respondent has prior kno....
The main legal point established is that the notice invoking arbitration must comply with the agreed dispute resolution mechanism and the statutory provisions, such as Section 19(2)(a) of the Indian ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the dispute amongst the partners regarding the dealings of the firm could be referred to arbitration as per the partnership deed, but once the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for an unequivocal and unambiguous consent by the parties to arbitrate, and the application of the prima facie test to determine th....
Arbitration clauses in prior agreements continue to bind new partners despite subsequent agreements lacking such clauses; issues about stamp duty deficiencies can be raised in arbitration.
A unilateral right of appointment for an arbitrator in an arbitration agreement is impermissible; however, notice of intent to arbitrate, even when lacking technical precision, can suffice for procee....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
