Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
Executive Engineer, Malampuzha – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Malampuzha Irrigation Thozhilali Union (INTUC) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the award on permanency (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. context of long-term casual employment (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. management's contention regarding employment status (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's consideration of employment relationship (Para 10 , 12 , 19) |
| 5. final determination on regularisation and compensation (Para 14 , 26 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
M.A. ABDUL HAKHIM, J.
1. The Petitioner is challenging Ext.P3 Award of the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad, in favour of twenty numbers of Workmen in I.D. No.10/2014 (Old No.48/1995). The Petitioner is the Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Malampuzha Dam of the State Government. The Petitioner is the Management in I.D. No.10/2014. The Respondent No.1 is the Trade Union which represented the Respondents Nos.2 to 21/Workmen in I.D. No.10/2014 before the Industrial Tribunal. Respondent No.5 died during the pendency of the Writ Petition, and the Additional Respondent Nos.22 to 24 were impleaded as his legal representatives.
2. The issue referred for adjudication to the Tribunal was whether the denial of permanency of the employment to the Workmen who were the garden workers of Malampuzha Dam is justifiable or not.
3. Since the Management d
The court confirmed that permanent employment requires formal appointment procedures, and mere long service does not grant entitlement to regularisation without mandated legal protocols.
Employees engaged in irregular appointments may be entitled to regularisation if they have served continuously and their appointments were not illegal.
The court upheld the Tribunal's awards for employee regularization, emphasizing the prohibition of unfair labor practices under the Industrial Disputes Act, while clarifying the need for state approv....
Employers cannot deny regularization to employees engaged in perennial work, regardless of claims of temporary employment, as such practices violate statutory obligations and constitute unfair labor ....
Labour Law – Unfair labour practice - when similarly situated workmen have been grated permanency by the University, non-granting of the same to the present workmen is nothing but an unfair labour pr....
The court affirmed that prolonged employment of daily wagers without regularization constitutes unfair labor practice, necessitating their regularization under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Long-term engagement of employees for over 240 days establishes entitlement to regularization, reinforcing the principle against unfair labor practices applicable to public sector employment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
