Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
S.D. Prasanna Mabel, D/o. Devaki – Appellant
Versus
Kamalasanan P., S/o. Late. Padmanabhan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges the dismissal of impleading. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner seeks to implead kottukal panchayat. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. munsiff's rationale for dismissing impleading application. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. no relief claimed against panchayat indicates notice may not be mandatory. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 5. court clarifies implications of notice under kpr act. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 6. notice is unnecessary if no action against panchayat is challenged. (Para 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
This original petition is filed challenging Ext.P6 order dated 04.10.2017 passed by the Court of the Principal Munsiff, Neyyattinkara, to the extent of rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for impleading the 5th respondent herein as the additional 5th defendant in O.S.No.1126 of 2014.
“7) The averments in Paras 7,8,9 and 10 in the plaint are incorrect hence denied. Plaintiff is not entitled to get her title declared, as the intention of the plaintiff is to use the Court of law as a shield to protect her unlawful acts. Plaintiff is not entitled to put up boundary including the pond and runnel. Plaintiff is not entitled to get any relief as stated in the plaint. The suit is not supported by a cause of action
Notice under Section 249 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act is not mandatory when no relief is claimed against the Panchayat, nor is any action by it challenged.
The court established that failure to issue a statutory notice under Section 249 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, necessitates the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.
Mandatory statutory notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure is essential for suits against public officers, and failure to comply renders the suit non-maintainable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a party may be considered necessary in a suit proceeding if its interest may be adversely affected, even if no relief is claimed against that ....
Notice under S.80 CPC is not required for suits filed under S.14 of the Kerala Surveys and Boundaries Act, as it is a special statute providing distinct remedies.
Section 191(4) of Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 is valid as Tribunal hearing under Section 191(2) ensures natural justice before Government suspension. Section 233(3) limits Panchayat to imposing co....
Assessment list in respect of a vacant land - It is trite law that an order passed by a quasi judicial authority determining the rights of the parties should contain reasons, as reasons would reflect....
The court found that civil suit maintainability was not barred by statutory inquiries regarding public road rights, affirming jurisdiction and upholding the enabling nature of relevant legislative pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
