SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 3247

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
M. Koyakutty – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Khadi & Village Industries Board, Thiruvananthapuram, Rep. By Its Secretary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. S. Muhammed Haneeff, Sri. R. Krishnakumar (Cherthala).
For the Respondents: Sri. C. Unnikrishnan (Kollam) SC, Sri. M. Sharafudheen, SC, N. Rajagopalan Nair, SC, Sri. P. Sankarankutty Nair, SC, ESI Corpn, Shri. C. Dinesh, CGC.

Headnote: Read headnote

Table of Content
1. challenge to rejected request for reckoning prior service for pension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. discussion on applicability of kerala service rules and prior service benefits. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11)
3. determination of whether esi corporation qualifies as a public sector undertaking. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. legal principles on vested rights and the impact of retrospective amendments. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
5. outcome of the petition with directives for pension adjustments. (Para 22)

JUDGMENT :

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top