SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 143

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V.MENON, J.
Govind Krishnan S/o Krishnakumar K. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Kerala – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 38556 of 2023,W.P. (C) Nos. 30073, 30446, 30528, 30536, 30943, 30948, 32002, 32069, 32123, 32257, 32496, 32519, 32780, 33009, 33097, 33100, 33200, 33472, 33553, 33619, 34335, 34343, 34571, 34587, 34726, 35307, 35365, 35512, 35671, 35754, 35917, 36128, 36171, 36200, 36493, 36503, 36805, 36992, 37064, 37325, 37452, 37664, 37730, 38491, 38602, 38672, 39589, 39635, 39871, 39909, 40173, 40399, 40635, 44080, 44160, 44501, 45134, 46013, 46104, 46772, 46955, 47010, 47536 of 2025
Decided On : 25-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : V.A. Muhammed, V. Rajasekharan Nair
For the Respondents: S. Ganesh, E.M. Murugan, P.R. Prateesh, P. Rakesh, K.R. Lekshmi, P. Sreekumar, P.G. Pramod, Mary Benjamin

The court ruled that the Fee Committee lacks authority to collect fees for a Corpus Fund without legislative backing, affirming that all prescribed tuition fees must be paid by students.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Medical Education (Regulation and Control of Admission to Private Medical Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 - Quashing of G.O.(MS) No. 107/2018/H&FWD fee fixation for NRI students. - The petitioners contended the prescribed fees under the NRI quota were arbitrary, asserting prior declarations of illegality by the court. The High Court maintained the principles of vested authority and legislative delegation, affirming the Fee Committee's lack of power to enforce payments to a Corpus Fund for scholarships, identifying discrepancies in fee structures as argued by both students and colleges. (Paras 1-18)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the quashing of the government's order and directed that no amounts shall be collected towards the Corpus Fund but maintained that the complete fee must be remitted as previously determined. (Paras 2, 12)

Issues: Whether the Fee Committee possessed the authority to create a Corpus Fund and whether students are entitled to refunds.

Ratio Decidendi: The court confirmed the Apex Court's ruling that while NRI fees could be set, the creation of designated funds was beyond the Committee's legal scope without legislative support.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed. (Paras 16-18)

Table of Content
1. medical colleges fee structure challenge (Para 1 , 2)
2. apex court's ruling on fee regulation (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments presented by petitioners and colleges (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's findings on fee committee's powers (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. final decision and dismissal of writ petitions (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.

[WP(C) Nos.38556/2023, 30073/2025, 30446/2025, 30528/2025, 30536/2025, 30943/2025, 30948/2025, 32002/2025, 32069/2025, 32123/2025, 32257/2025, 32496/2025, 32519/2025, 32780/2025, 33009/2025, 33097/2025, 33100/2025, 33200/2025, 33472/2025, 33553/2025, 33619/2025, 34335/2025, 34343/2025, 34571/2025, 34587/2025, 34726/2025, 35307/2025, 35365/2025, 35512/2025, 35671/2025, 35754/2025, 35917/2025, 36128/2025, 36171/2025, 36200/2025, 36493/2025, 36503/2025, 36805/2025, 36992/2025, 37064/2025, 37325/2025, 37452/2025, 37664/2025, 37730/2025, 38491/2025, 38602/2025, 38672/2025, 39589/2025, 39635/2025, 39871/2025, 39909/2025, 40173/2025, 40399/2025, 40635/2025, 44080/2025, 44160/2025, 44501/2025, 45134/2025, 46013/2025, 46104/2025, 46772/2025, 46955/2025, 47010/2025, 47536/2025]

1. Medical education and the fees payable by students have been on the dissection table before this Court on many occasions. The present batch of writ petitions is also one such instance where the students contend that the fee prescribed require to be “dissected” and the alleged collection of Rs.5,00,000/- by the medical colleges for admissions under the Non-Resident Indian (NRI) quota be declared illegal, in view of the earlier declaration of law by the Division Bench of this Court as confirmed by the Apex Court.

2. The petitioners in these cases contend that the fee payable for admission and later studies in the NRI quota in the Self-Financing Medical Colleges was only Rs.15,00,000/- as fixed by the Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee for Medical Education in Kerala (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Fee Committee’) constituted under the Kerala Medical Education (Regulation and Control of Admission to Private Medical Educational Institutions) Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act 2017’) and that the Fee Committee determined the fee payable for the academic year 2017 onwards arbitrarily at an exorbitant figure, out of which an amount of Rs.5 lakhs was set apart Towards the “Corpus Fund” so as to finance the education of the students in the BPL category. They point out that the fixation as above has been challenged before this Court and in the judgment reported as Director, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute v. State of Kerala and Others , 2020 (3) KLT 615 , a Division Bench of this Court found that the Fee Committee has no power to direct payment of a portion of the amount to be collected from the students for any other purpose under the Act, 2017. The fixation was also found to be illegal for various other reasons, directing the Fee Committee to reconsider the matter afresh in the light of the directions contained therein. They state that, while the matter was pending consideration before the Committee, the Government issued G.O.(MS) No. 107/2018/H&FWD dated 06.06.2018, framing a scholarship scheme to provide financial assistance to BPL students from the tuition fee fixed by the Fee Committee. Annexure A, forming part of the Government Order issued as above, provides for the composition of a Corpus Fund of Rs.5,00,000/- each from the NRI seat out of the fee to be fixed by the Fee Committee. The afore Government Order was, in turn, challenged by filing W.P.(C) No.33160 of 2018 and connected cases before this Court. A Division Bench of this Court, by judgment dated 23.07.2023, noticing the earlier judgment in Director, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute (supra), found that neither the Committee nor the Government had any authority to levy an amount, to be credited to a Corpus Fund, “in the absence of conferment of such authority by the legis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top