Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN
Vijesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Rep.By Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal background of the case and charges against the accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of the incident and eyewitness accounts. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. medical evidence supporting the cause of death. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. reliability of eyewitness testimony and its evidentiary value. (Para 17 , 18 , 38) |
| 5. legal determination of liability for the acts of joint criminals. (Para 19 , 39) |
| 6. arguments regarding the credibility of testimonies and procedural delays. (Para 20 , 34 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
Jobin Sebastian, J.
These appeals have been preferred, challenging the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed against the accused in S.C. No. 25/2009 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court-II, Thalassery, for offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 447, 324, and 302 r/w Section 149 of the IPC . Apart from that, accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5 were also found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 148 of the , and accused Nos. 1 and 5 were further found guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act . Out of these appeals, Crl. A. No. 1040/2019 has been preferred by accused No. 1, Crl. A. No. 913/2019 by
The evidential weight of injured witnesses' testimony is paramount in establishing guilt, with due consideration given to the context and circumstances of the incident.
The court confirmed that shared intent among an unlawful assembly to commit harm is sufficient for establishing guilt under relevant IPC sections, outweighing political affiliations of witnesses or a....
Prosecution must substantiate charges with reliable evidence; significant discrepancies in witness statements and medical evidence warrant acquittal.
Conviction based on unreliable eyewitness testimonies that lack independent corroboration cannot establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Offences under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, being non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC, cannot be compounded post-conviction. However, an amicable settlement between involved parties may ....
The testimony of relatives is not inherently suspect and can be reliable if corroborated by evidence, while conspiracy requires proof of prior agreement, which was lacking in this case.
Point of law : normal discrepancies in the evidence are those which are due to normal errors of observation, normal errors of memory due to lapse of time, due to mental disposition such as shock and ....
In prosecutions involving serious charges, the burden lies on the prosecution to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discrepancies in evidence or lack of corroboration can lead to acquittal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
