SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 550

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J.
Annamma Jacob – Appellant 
Versus 
Secretary To Government, Education Department – Respondent 
WP(C) NO. 11715 OF 2018
Decided on : 07-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADVS. SRI.ABRAHAM VAKKANAL (SR.) SMT.VINEETHA SUSAN THOMAS SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL
For the Respondent: ADVS. SHRI.PAULSON THOMAS SMT.MABLE C KURIAN,GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Denial of departmental test exemption to aided school teachers while granting it to Government sector teachers, despite identical duties, constitutes discriminatory practice under Article 14, and curative Government orders clarifying such rights operate retrospectively to rectify administrative omissions.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Chapter XXXII - Rule 9 - Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules (KS&SSR) - Part II - Rule 13B - Higher Secondary School Teachers (HSSTs) - Exemption from departmental tests - Denying exemption to aided school teachers who have attained age of 50 years while granting same to Government school teachers held discriminatory - No intelligible differentia exists between duties of Government and aided school teachers - Clarificatory Government Orders operate retrospectively - Curative nature of orders. (Paras 63, 64, 65, 66)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, Higher Secondary School Teachers (HSST) serving in aided schools, were denied annual increments and probation declaration due to their failure to pass mandatory departmental tests prescribed under Chapter XXXII of the Kerala Education Rules, despite having attained the age of 50 years. They challenged this denial, arguing that their counterparts in Government service are granted permanent exemption from such tests upon reaching age 50 under Rule 13B of the KS&SSR. The Government subsequently issued orders in 2023 and 2024 clarifying that such exemption applies to aided school principals as well.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the exclusion of aided school principals from the exemption was discriminatory as there is no rational basis or intelligible differentia between the two categories. It reasoned that the subsequent Government Orders were curative and clarificatory, thus entitled to retrospective effect, and that administrative delay in amending rules should not prejudice the teachers.

Issues: 1. Whether there is a rational distinction between aided and Government school teachers regarding test exemption. 2. Whether the lack of express provision in the Kerala Education Rules justifies the denial of exemption to aided school teachers. 3. Whether the 2023/2024 Government Orders have retrospective effect.

Ratio Decidendi: Teachers in aided and Government schools perform identical duties and share the same qualifications; therefore, providing service benefits to one group while denying them to another without rational basis violates Article 14 of the Constitution. Provisions intended to correct obvious omissions or anomalies are curative and apply retrospectively.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. The question that arises for consideration in these writ petitions is whether there exists any intelligible differentia in denying exemption from passing departmental tests to Higher Secondary School Teachers (HSSTs) in aided schools who have attained the age of 50 years, while granting such exemption to HSSTs in Government service under Rule 13B of Part II of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules (KS&SSR).

2. Since the issue involved in both writ petitions is identical, they are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.

WP(C) No.11715 of 2018

3. The petitioner herein entered service as HSA (Biology) on 04.10.1993. Subsequently, upon the establishment of the Higher Secondary Section, she was promoted as HSST (Botany). Thereafter, she was appointed as Principal of CMS HSS, Melukavu, on 01.08.2011, which appointment was approved by the Regional Deputy Director as per order dated 07.10.2011. Later, the Manager declared her probation with effect from 06.12.2013, upon her attaining the age of 51 years, taking into account the exemption available under Rule 13B of Part II KS&SSR as applicable to HSSTs in Government service. The petitioner was granted annual increments from 2013 to2016.

4. However, when she applied for the annual increment for the year 2017 on 04.01.2018, the same was denied on the ground that she had not passed the obligatory departmental tests, as evident from Ext.P2. Aggrieved thereby, she submitted Ext.P3 representation before the Regional Deputy Director and subsequently Ext.P4 before the Government, contending that upon attaining the age of 50 years, she was entitled to exemption from test qualifications on par with HSSTs in Government service. It was further contended that her appointment and promotion had already been duly approved.

WP(C) No.6969 of 2021

5. The petitioner herein was initially appointed as HSST (Junior) (History) on 25.08.2003 and was promoted as HSST on 15.07.2004. Being the senior-most HSST, she was promoted as Principal with effect from 15.07.2004. The said appointment was approved as per order dated 12.08.2006 with effect from 15.07.2004. However, as per Ext.P3 dated 30.01.2021, the Regional Deputy Director informed that her probation could not be declared due to non-acquisition of departmental test qualifications. This position was reiterated by the Joint Director as per Ext.P4 and the Government as per Ext.P5, resulting in withholding of her salary from 2021 onwards.

6. The petitioner seeks a declaration that Principals of aided Higher Secondary Schools are also entitled to exemption from test qualifications upon attaining the age of 50 years, as is the case with their counterparts in Government service.

7. The legal issue involved in these cases are summarised as follows:

8. The appointment of Principals in aided Higher Secondary Schools is governed by Rule 9, Chapter XXXII of the Kerala Education Rules (KER), which mandates passing of prescribed departmental tests during probation. Rule 7 of Chapter XXXII KER deals with probation. Rules 45B and 45BB of Chapter XIVA KER provide exemption from test qualifications to certain categories of teachers in aided schools upon attaining the age of 50 years. Rule 13B of Part II KS&SSR grants permanent exemption from passing departmental tests to Government servants who attain the age of 50 years.

9. In both these cases, the appointments of the incumbents as Principal were approved by the respective Deputy Directors. The appointment of Principal in higher secondary school in aided sector is guided by Rule 9 Chapter XXXII KER, which says:

“Every person appointed to the category of Principal, shall during the period of probation, pass the Account Test for Executive Officers (Kerala) or Account Test (Lower) if he has not already passed the test.”

Rule 7 of chapter XXXII KER deals with the declaration of probation of higher secondary school teachers, and reads as follows:

“Every person appointed to any of the categories shall fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top