IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Moosa, Manager, Amlp School, Alanalloor and others - Appellants
Versus
State of Kerala, Secretary, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram and others - Respondents
WP(C). Nos. 16198, 17534, 29964 of 2010(S) and 27670, 27993 of 2015.
Decided on : 24-02-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 21, 21A, 41 and 46 - Education Act, 2009 - Section 24 - Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 30 and 145 - Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Kerala Education Rules, 1959 - Rule 23, 25 26, 36 and 37 - Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualifications) Act, 1951 - Section 2(iv) - Election - Eligibility/Qualification/Disqualification - Election Commissions - Teacher/aided/unaided school - Office of profit - Public interest writ petitions are filed generally with prayers for issuance of a writ, order, or direction, declaring that teaching staff of aided schools are not entitled to contest in election to local bodies, including State Legislative Assembly and Parliament - Counsel for petitioners regard to noble objects of Articles 21 and 21A of Constitution, provisions of Act, 1951, removing disqualification of teachers other than teachers of Government schools is unconstitutional - Further submitted that while Act, 1951 was enacted, imparting education to children was not given importance, and applying provisions of Right of Children for Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, in true sense, Section 2(iv) of Act, 1951 cannot be sustained - Whether paid by salary or commission, to any insurance company or society, except taking part in management of a mutual benefit society, if he has obtained sanction of Deputy Director of Education
Finding of the Court: A teacher working in an aided school, desirous of being elected as a member of the Legislative Assembly or a Councilor or a Ward Member of local bodies, as case may be, can never devote his/her attention to cause of students, during election period, and once they are chosen would spend time, to discharge his/her duties as representatives - Section 2(iv) of Act, 1951 cannot be said to be a provision constitutionally valid and therefore, Section 2(iv) of Act, 1951 is declared as ultra vires to Article 21A of Constitution - A teacher of an aided educational institution, within the State of Kerala, in terms of the provisions of Act, 1958, and rules framed thereunder, is a person holding an 'office of profit', under the Government of State of Kerala. Rule 56 of Rules, 1959, providing teachers to take leave, to contest in the elections to various bodies, would be redundant and inconsequential.
Result: Writ petitions disposed of
JUDGMENT :
S. Manikumar, J
Instant public interest writ petitions are filed generally with prayers for issuance of a writ, order, or direction, declaring that the teaching staff of aided schools are not entitled to contest in the election to the local bodies, including State Legislative Assembly and Parliament. As they are working in aided schools, petitioners, interalia, have sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus declaring that the exemption, if any, granted to the aided school teachers, permitting them to contest in various elections conducted by the Election Commissions, as nonest in the eye of law, and to declare the same as void.
2. In W.P.(C) No.17534/2010, the petitioner therein has sought for a direction to the State and the Director of Public Instructions, to make suitable amendments in the Kerala Educational Rules, 1956, to give effect to the directions stipulated in the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.
3. In W.P.(C) No.27670/2015, the petitioner therein has sought for a direction declaring that aided school teachers are not entitled to be engaged in political activities and to contest for election to Local Self Government bodies under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, as well as the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994. The petitioner has also sought for a direction to the State officials, to issue necessary orders prohibiting aided school teachers from engaging in political activities and contesting the election to Local Self Government bodies under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, as well as the Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994.
4. However, distinct from the reliefs sought for in other writ petitions, in W.P.(C) No.29964/2010, the petitioner therein has sought for a declaration that any provision permitting contest in elections to the Parliament, State Assembly or Local Body by the teachers of private educational institutions, both under aided and unaided sector, shall be unconstitutional and violative of Articles 21, 21A, 41 and 46 of the Constitution of India.
5. That apart, petitioner therein has also sought for a declaration that Section 2(1)(iv) of the Legislative Assembly (Removal of Disqualifications) Act, 1951 permitting the office holders in private educational institutions to be members of the local bodies or Central or State Legislative bodies, is in violation of Articles 41 and 46, and ultravires to Articles 21 and 21A of the Constitution of India and quash the same.
6. For appropriate disposal of the writ petitions, we deem it fit that the parties can be referred as they are arrayed in W.P.(C) No.29964/2010, and to rely on the basic contentions raised, as well as the counter affidavit filed thereto by the State Government.
7. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.29964/2010, is a retired Director of Doordarshan, Mangalore Station, and was serving as the Director of Audiovisual communication in Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), Kochi, at the time of filing the writ petition. According to him, the experience gained by him for having served under the mass communication field over last three decades, having authored stage plays and children books, conveying the message for social working, has constrained him to file the writ petition, to prevent the massive participation of the teachers, working in private educational institutions, including Government aided colleges and school, in active politics and contest in elections to the Parliament, State Assembly, and local bodies, by diluting the quality of service to the cause of education and breeding fissiparous and divisive tendencies among the students and society, on account of petty political considerations.
8. Petitioner therein has further stated that while service rules applicable to the Government teachers interdict the involvement in active politics and contest in elections, the teachers in private sector, discharging the very same functions, are freely allowed to actively participate in politics, including making recrimin
Asharaf Kokkur v. K.V. Abdul Khader and Ors. [2015 (2) KLT 559]
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. (AIR 1984 SC 802)
Bhagwan Dass Sehgal v. State of Haryana and Ors. [(1975) 1 SCC 249]
Biharilal Dobray v. Roshan Lal Dobray reported in AIR 1984 SC 385 : (1984) 1 SCC 551
Bachahan Devi and Ors. v. Nagar Nigam
Budhan Choudhary v. State of Bihar reported in AIR 1955 SC 191
Confederation of Ex-Servicemen Association v. Union of India
Deewan Singh and others v. Rajendra Pd. Ardevi and others reported in (2007) 10 SCC 528
Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of U.P. and Ors. [(2007) 8 SCC 338]
Dr. Deorao Laxman Anande v. Keshav Laxman Borkar [AIR 1958 Bom 314]
Election Commission of India v. St. Mary's School and Ors. reported in AIR 2008 SC 655
Gopala Kurup v. Samuel Arulappan Paul and Ors.
Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia v. Union of India
Jaya Bachchan v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. [(2006) 5 SCC 266]
Joti Prasad v. Kafka Prasad [AIR 1962 All 128]
Kanta Kathuria v. Mank Chand Surana reported in (1969) 3 SCC 268
Kona Prabhakar Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao [AIR 1981 SC 658]
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [1978 (1) SCC 248]
Mini Venugopal v. State of Kerala and others reported in [2011 (4) KHC 860]
Islamic Academy of Education v. State of Karnataka reported in AIR 2003 SC 3724
In re Special Courts Bill, 1978
K. Krishnamacharyulu v. Sri Venkateswar Hindu College of Engineering reported in (1997) 3 SCC 571
K. Thimmappa v. Chairman, Central Board of Directors, SBI
L. Hirday Narain v. Income Tax Officer, Bareilly
L.I.C. of India and Another v. Consumer Education & Research Centre and Others
Miss. Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka and Ors. reported in (1992) 3 SCC 666
Mangalam Organics Ltd. v. Union of India (UOI) [(2017) 7 SCC 221]
Mohd. Shujat Ali v. Union of India [1975 (3) SCC 76]
Probhudas Morarjee Rajkotia v. Union of India
Ravanna Subana v. G.S. Kageerappa AIR 1954 SC 653
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendolkar
Rakesh Gupta v. State of Hyderabad reported in AIR 1996 AP 413
State of Meghalaya and Ors. v. All Dimasa Students Union
State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar & Another
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Shiv Kumar Pathak and Others reported in (2014) 15 SCC 606
Shayara Bano v. Union of India
S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India
Shrikant v. Deputy Director of Education
Satyawati Sharma v. Union of India and another
Sri Srinivasa Theatre and others v. Government of Tamil Nadu and others
Shibu Soren v. Dayanand Sahay and Ors. [(2001) 7 SCC 425]
Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju v. Vyricherla Pradeep Kumar Dev and Ors. (1992) 4 SCC 404
State of Jammu & Kashmir v. Triloki Nath Khosa (AIR 1974 SC 1)
Smt. Bachahan Devi and Anr. v. Nagar Nigam
State of Kerala and Ors. v. Kandath Distilleries
State of Gujarat and Ors. v. Raman Lal Keshav Lal Soni and Ors. [(1983) 2 SCC 33]
Shivamurthy Swami Inamdar v. Agadi Sanganna Andanappa [(1971) 3 SCC 870]
Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju v. Vyricherla Pradeep Kumar Dev (AIR 1992 SC 1959)
Shibu Soren v. Dayanand Sahay and Ors. [(2001) 3 SCR 1020]
State of H.P. v. Recognised & Aided Schools Managing Committee
Venkateshwara Theatre v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Western M.P. Electric Power & Supply Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P.
University of Delhi and Another v. Anand Vardhan Chandal reported in (2000) 10 SCC 648
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.