Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Achamma Alex W/o. Mathew T. Thomas – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the petitioner’s service history. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding applicability of ugc regulations. (Para 4 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's decision to uphold petitioner's claims. (Para 8 , 18) |
| 4. legal interpretation of ugc regulations precedence. (Para 14 , 15 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Muralee Krishna S., J.
The point that arises for consideration in this writ appeal is whether there is any illegality in the finding of the learned Single Judge that Regulation 4.1.V.B.(ii) of the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualification for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standard in Higher Education, 2018, (‘ UGC Regulations 2018 ’ for short) will prevail over the conflicting provisions in Exts.P4 and P6 Government Orders dated 29.06.2019 and 29.09.2019, bearing G.O.(P) No.18/2019/HEdn and G.O.(P) No.28/2019/HEdn, respectively?
2. This writ appeal has been filed by respondents 1 to 3 in W.P.(C)No.9523 of 2024, under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 21.06.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition. For convenience of reference, the parti
Timely submission of academic qualifications and publications is essential for faculty promotions under UGC regulations; delays in challenges to university decisions can invalidate claims.
Point of Law : UGC regulations - There was no provision in the M.G. University Law for fixing the tenure of appointment of Principals as deemed to be permanent nature.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the 2010 Regulations provide for the counting of previous regular service for the purposes of grant of benefits under CAS, without making a....
Point of Law : Irrespective of whether the University Acts under Entry 25 of List III or the Statutes framed there under are amended in line with the UGC Regulations or not, in view of its adoption b....
(1) It is mandatory for UGC to be guided by directions issued by Central Government on questions of policy relating to national purposes by discharging its functions under UGC Act, 1956.(2) A Judgmen....
The denial of UGC scale of pay from the date of regularization based on unjust conditions is discriminatory, violating equal treatment under Article 14.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
