SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Raj) 1470

DINESH MAHESHWARI
Hanuman Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. B.L. Maheshwari, for the Petitioner.

Judgment

Dinesh Maheswri, J. The petitioner Hanuman Ram, describing himself as resident of village Nandia Prabhawati, being holder of a driving licence to drive heavy vehicles, at present being a driver at a truck of one Chokha Ram, and allegedly sharing business with him; has submitted this writ petition with the averments about location of his village enroute Jodhpur-Bhopalgarh-Asop-Mundwa-Kuchera-Khajwana-Merta City-Pipar City-Gaguda existing amalgamated route and about the difficulties of the travelling public because of reduction of daily services by the State Road Transport Corporation on the route. According to the petitioner, one Ram Vilas, an erstwhile permit holder on Merta City to Baori route, met him on 26.02.2006 and informed that the transport services on Merta City to Baori route have deteriorated after it was notified; and now it was the turn of Jodhpur-Bhopalgarh amalgamated route (to be notified) for which a proposal has been published. The petitioner has alleged that upon enquires he came to know about publication of notification dated 12.09.2005 on the proposal regarding Jodhpur-Bhopalgarh scheme and that the Government has invited objections from the persons ag



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top