SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 646

M.G.MUKHERJI
Kailash Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bajrang Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kamlakar Sharma, for the Appellant
K.K. Mehrish, for the Respondents

Judgment

M.G. Mukherji, J.-Plaintiff is petitioner before me impugning an order dated 19-9-95 passed by the learned Addl. Distt. Judge, Bundi in civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 72/94 whereby the lower appellate Court rejected the appeal of the petitioner and upheld the order dated 22-11-94 as passed by the learned civil Judge (Sr. Division), Nainwa in case No. 1/94.

2. Plaintiff filed a civil suit against his parents alleging inter alia that there existed certain ancestral properties comprising of agricultural land as well as ancestral house situated in Village Alod details of which were given in para 4 of the plaint. He claimed that he had half share along with his younger brother Kishan Lal and that in all these properties, he was a co-owner. His further contention inter alia was that he and his father were also co-owners of gold, silver and jewellery belonging to the family which had been purchased from the income of the immovable properties of the family and are lying in Locker No. 67 of the State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Old Dhan Mandi Branch, Bundi, which was being operated jointly by the defendants and the locker stands in their own name. It was also submitted that the jew










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top