SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 752

ARUN MADAN, G.L.GUPTA
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CANTEEN MANAGEMENT – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA KUMAR SAXENA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MOHD.RAFIQ

Judgment


ARUN MADAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS special appeal is directed against the order dated July 28, 2000 passed by the learned single Judge allowing an application filed by krishna Kumar Saxena (respondent No. 1)under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes act, 1947, during the pendency of S. B. Civil writ Petition No. 2661/1996, wherein the petitioner has challenged the Award dated september 26, 1995 (Annexure 5) of the central Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur holding that canteen is an industry thereby removal of the respondent No. 1 was retrenchment and violative of Section 25-F and therefore holding the respondent entitled to full back wages from january 2, 1-984 to June 1991 alongwith reinstatement in service but for period from july, 1991 onwards the matter was left open for adjudication under Section 33-C (2) of the Act, if applied for by the respondent No. 1. The writ petition was admitted on September 4, 1996.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned order of the learned single Judge, who allowed respondent No. 1s application u/section 17-B of the Act and directed the petitioner to make the payment of salary to respondent No. 1 at the rate
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top