1993 Supreme(Raj) 48
High Court Of Rajasthan
Judgename : J.R.CHOPRA,N.K.JAIN
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, BHILWARA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN - Respondent
D. B. C. S. A. 116 Of 1981
Decided On : 01/28/1993
D.R.Bhandari, D.R.BOHRA, L.R.Mehta, R.Mehta
The use of the word "raw" in the phrase "following raw materials" in notifications granting exemption from octroi duty to a particular industry is surplus and redundant. The notifications should be interpreted to extend the exemptions to all the items mentioned therein, including chemicals, fuels and lubricants, packing materials, and other items, in order to further the object of the notifications and avoid absurdity.
Headnote:
OCTROI DUTY - EXEMPTION - INTERPRETATION OF NOTIFICATIONS - RAW MATERIALS - SCOPE: The use of the word "raw" in the phrase "following raw materials" in notifications granting exemption from octroi duty to a particular industry is surplus and redundant. The notifications should be interpreted to extend the exemptions to all the items mentioned therein, including chemicals, fuels and lubricants, packing materials, and other items, in order to further the object of the notifications and avoid absurdity.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a municipality, challenged the interpretation given by the High Court to two notifications issued by the State Government granting exemption from octroi duty to a particular industry. The notifications used the phrase "following raw materials" in the upper part, but then carved out sub-heads for raw materials, chemicals, fuels and lubricants, packing materials, and other items. The petitioner contended that only raw materials were exempted from octroi duty, while the industry claimed exemption for all the items mentioned in the notifications.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the use of the word "raw" in the phrase "following raw materials" was surplus and redundant. The notifications should be interpreted to extend the exemptions to all the items mentioned therein, including chemicals, fuels and lubricants, packing materials, and other items, in order to further the object of the notifications and avoid absurdity. The Court also held that the notifications mentioned in Schedule c, which were of general application, could not override the notifications mentioned in Schedules a and b, which pertained to a particular industry.
Issues: 1. Whether the use of the word "raw" in the phrase "following raw materials" in the notifications limited the exemption from octroi duty to raw materials only. 2. Whether the notifications mentioned in Schedule c could override the notifications mentioned in Schedules a and b.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the use of the word "raw" in the phrase "following raw materials" was surplus and redundant. The notifications should be interpreted to extend the exemptions to all the items mentioned therein, including chemicals, fuels and lubricants, packing materials, and other items, in order to further the object of the notifications and avoid absurdity. The Court relied on the following principles of interpretation: (a) The intention of the legislature is primarily to be gathered from the language used. (b) A plain grammatical and literal meaning should be given to the words used by the Statute, but if that material word is capable of two constructions then the one which furthers the object, for which, the Statute has been carved out should be adopted and no such interpretation should be given to the Words used which may stifle the very object of the Statute, or it may result in absurdity or mischief. (c) The heading prefixed to sections or entries cannot control the plain words of the provision; they cannot also be referred to for the purpose of construing the provision when the words used in the provision are clear and unambiguous, nor can they be used for cutting down the plain meaning of,the words in the provision. 2. The Court held that the notifications mentioned in Schedule c, which were of general application, could not override the notifications mentioned in Schedules a and b, which pertained to a particular industry.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner.
( 1 ) THIS special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed against the Judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court dated Nov. 21, 1980 whereby the learned single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed on behalf of the petitioner-appellant.
( 2 ) HOWEVER, while interpreting the two Notifications dated 31/05/1966 and 12/07/1966 issued by the Govt. of Rajasthan, the learned single Judge has observed:"having regrd to the context of the two notifications and having regard to the accepted construction which has been placed on the two notifications, I am of the opinion that the notifications should be so construed so as to extend the exemptions to all the items mentioned therein. This may be done either by treating the word raw as surplusage in the opening part or by treating that the raw materials have been defined so as to cover all the items in all the sub-heads of the two notifications. The power of granting as well defining exemptions is vested in the State Govt. under Section 107 sub-s. (5) of the Act. it was further held by the learned single Judge that the orders Exs. 3, 4, 5 and 6 do not deserve to be quashed. He has further held that challenge to the notifications mentioned in Scheule c was not pressed before him. The learned single Judge has further held as under: although, it may be observed that the tenure of notifications in Schedules a and b is 10 years or till a policy decision is taken by the Govt. on the report of the High Power Committee whichever is earlier. On behalf of the petitioner, no material has been placed on record that any report was submitted by the High Power Committee and on such a report, a policy decision was taken and in pursuance of that policy decision, notifications in Schedule c were issued. Apart from that, the notifications in Schedule c are general in nature whereas the notifications of Schedule a and b relate to an individual i. e. respondent No. 3 and these notifications cannot be said to have been superseded, by notifications mentioned in Schedule c. Thus, the last notification in Schedule c cannot be taken to over-ride or supersede the notifications in Schedules a and b. "
( 3 ) A very short question, that is involved in this appeal, is as to whether the use of the word raw materials as used in the Notifications dated 31/05/1966 and 12/07/1966 mentioned in Schedules a and b cover the entire items mentioned in these Notifications as regards exemption of octroi duty?
( 4 ) WE have heard Mr. D. R. Bhandari, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Mr. D. R. Bohra, the learned Deputy Govt. Advocate and M/s. L. R. Mehta and R. Mehta, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 and have carefully gone thorugh the record of the case.
( 5 ) TO decide the controversy involved in this case, it will be very useful to quote the Notifications dated 31/05/1966, and 12/07/1966 mentioned in Schedules a and b and verbatim:schedule a rajasthan VANASPATI PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED. RAW MATERIALS no. Tax/f. 139 (1)DLB/58 Jaipur, dated 31/05/1966. In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (5) of Section 107 of the Rajasthan Muncipalities Act,1959 (Act No. 38 of 1959), the State Govt. being of the opinion that reasonable grounds exist for doing so, hereby grants exemption to Rajasthan Vanaspati Products Private Ltd. , Bhilwara from payment of Octroi duty on the following raw materials imported from outside Bhilwara for a period of 10 years or till a policy decision is taken by the Govt. on the report of the High Power Committee, whichever is earlier, from the date of issue of this Notification in the Rajasthan Rajpatra. raw MATERIALS 1. Raw Materials:-ground nut, Cotton seed, Til Seed, Copra and oils and. oil cakes thereof required for manufacture of products. 2. Chemicals caustic Soda, Nickel Formate, Nickel, Catalyst, Fullers Earth, Hyflow Supercell, Salt common Citric, Acid, Soda Ash, Sodium Sillicate, Sulphuric acid, Hyd