SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 4

K.C.AGRAWAL, M.B.SHARMA, N.L.TIBREWAL
MOHAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MISHRA, K.N.Garg, M.K.KAUSHIK

Judgment


N. L. TIBREWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS Larger Bench is required to answer the following questions of law referred to it :-I) Whether composition of offence/offences, except as provided by Section 320 Cr. P. C. , can be permitted in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr. P. C. , specially when Sub-Section (9) of Section 320 Cr. P. C. expressly prohibits; ii) If the answer is given in affirmative, whether this permission can be granted after the conviction of the accused under the offence/offences which is/are not compoundable under Section 320 Cr. P. C. The necessity to answer second question shall arise only if question No. 1 is decided in the affirmative.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts necessitating the reference are :the petitioner-Mohan Singh was convicted and sentenced by the trial Magistrate under Section 326 IPC to one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000. 00 vide judgment dated 29/03/1985 for causing grievous injury to Gulab Singh. He preferred an appeal which was pending for disposal in the court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, District Jaipur. Before the appellate court, a compromise petition under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top