SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Raj) 69

S.C.AGARWAL
MOHD. ALEEM – Appellant
Versus
MAQSOOD ALAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.M.MEHTA

Judgment


S. C. AGRAWAL, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dt. 11th Oct. 1984 passed by the Additional Civil Judge No. 1, Kota, in Execution Petition No. 28/83 whereby the Additional Civil Judge rejected the objections submitted by the petitioner and Mohammad Salim non-petitioner 4 against the petition filed by non-petitioners 1, 2 and 3 for execution of a decree passed by this Court in favour of Khurshid Alam (deceased ). The non-petitioners 1, 2 and 3 are the heirs and the legal representatives of Khurshid Alam.

( 2 ) KHURSHID Alam had filed a suit (Civil Suit No. 173/62) against his step mother, Smt. Fatima Begum, and his brother, Mazhar Ali, for the recovery of possession of a house situated in Ladpura, Kota City on the basis of a gift made in his favour by his grandfather, Madar Ali. The said suit was also for taking account of the mesne profits of the house from the date of the suit till the date of the delivery of the possession. In the said suit a decree for eviction was passed by the Civil Judge, Kota, in favour of Khurshid Alam and against Smt. Fatima Begum on 9th July, 1958. The Civil Judge also passed a decree for mesne profits from the date of the sui






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top