M.C.JAIN
PRAKASH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
SUNDER BAI – Respondent
M. C. JAIN, J.
( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order of the District Judge, Udaipur, dated 12-9-78 whereby the order of the Civil Judge, Udaipur, dated 10-1-78 was upheld and the defendant-petitioners application for setting aside the ex parte decree was dismissed.
( 2 ) THE facts leading to the present revision petition may briefly be stated as under: the plaintiffs Arjundas and Smt. Sun deri Bai instituted a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment against the tenantdefendant Prakash chandra on 4-11-76 on the grounds of personal necessity, sub-letting and default. After registration of the case, summons was ordered to be issued for 10-1-77. On 10-1-77 fresh summons was ordered to be issued for 21-2-77, as the earlier summonses did not return. Summons was issued at the Kankarauli address of the defendant through court. On 21-2-77 summons returned unserved with the endorsement that the defendant was not available at his given address and is at Udaipur. The plaintiffs submitted an application the summons may be issued through registered post, whereupon the court ordered issue of summons through registered post as well as through court for 12-4-77. On 12-4-77, it
D.L.F. Housing and Construction Co. (P) Ltd. v. Sarup Singh
Balakrishna Udayar v. Vasudeva Ayyar
Balanagar v. Ajit Prasad Tarway
Pandurang Dhondi v. Maruti Hari Jadhav
N.S. Venkatagiri Ayyanagar v. Hindu Religious Endowments Board, Madras
Manindra Land Building Corporation Ltd. v. Bhutnath Banerjee
Hakim Chulam Mohammad v. Dr. Zaoor Mohammad
Samanta Kumar v. Brundabati Veergam
Raghubir Sahai Bhatnagar v. Bhakht Sajjan
Parasuram Odayar v. Appadurai Chetty
Pazhekottal Nabeesu v. Pazhekottal Kunhamina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.