SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 43

D.M.BHANDARI, K.N.WANCHOO, K.L.BAPNA
RAMNATH – Appellant
Versus
DWARKA PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B.Bhargava, R.K.Rastogi

Judgment


K. N. WANCHOO, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Full Bench has been constituted to resolve a conflict which has arisen between two decisions of this Court both by Division Benches. The first decision was given on 1-10-1956 in Kishorilal v. Indersingh Mehta, (Civil Writ Petition No. 191 of 1956) decided at Jaipur. It was held there that an election petition under rule 19 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Election Rules, 1954, (hereinafter called the rules) could be filed even before the election was notified under Rule 18 (c) read with Section 14 o the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, No. XXI of 1953 (hereinafter called the Act ). The second decision was given on the 11th of October, 1957 at jodhpur in Civil Writ patition No. 114 of 1956 Mangilal v. The Collector of Bhilwara, (AIR 1958 Raj 84 ). As the first decision was not marked "reportable", it was not known in Jodhpur when the second decision was given. The question, which falls for consideration, may be formulated as follows : can an election petition under Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Panchayat election Rules, 1954 be filed before the notification under Rule 18 (c) of the same rules read with Section 14 of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act (No. XXI of 1953)


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top