J.M.PANCHAL, B.S.CHAUHAN
Sawaran Lata – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
2. These special leave petitions have been filed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 30.5.2009 by which the Civil Writ Petition Nos.8794 of 2009 and 8761 of 2009 have been dismissed only on the ground of delay. The Review Petitions were filed which were also time barred by 48 days. The same stood dismissed vide order dated 25.9.2009. These special leave petitions have been filed with an inordinate delay of 172 days. Petitioners sought relief of quashing the land acquisition proceedings in respect of which the award had been made under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called as “Act 1894”) on 27.4.2004.
3. The facts and circumstances giving rise to these petitions are that the respondent - State of Haryana issued a notification under Section 4 of Act 1894 in respect of a huge chunk of land including some land of the petitioners on 2nd May, 2001. Substance of the said notification was published in
Hari Singh & Ors. vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1984 SC 1020) 6
Aflatoon & Ors. vs. Lt. Governor
State of Mysore vs. V.K. Kangan (AIR 1975 SC 2190) 8
Pt. Girdharan Prasad Missir vs. State of Bihar ((1980) 2 SCC 83) 8
Bhoop Singh vs. Union of India (AIR 1992 SC 1414) 8
State of Orissa vs. Dhobei Sethi & Anr. ((1995) 5 SCC 583) 8
State of Maharashtra vs. Digambar (AIR 1995 SC 1991) 8
State of Tamil Nadu vs. L. Krishnan (AIR 1996 SC 497 = RLW 1996(2) SC 13) 8
C. Padma & Ors. vs. Dy. Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu & Ors. ((1997) 2 SCC 627) 8
State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. D.R. Laxmi & Ors. ((1996) 6 SCC 445 = RLW 1996(3) SC 54) 10
Northern Indian Glass Industries vs. Jaswant Singh & Ors. (AIR 2003 SC 234) 11
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.