SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 1469

J.C.VERMA
Kanchan Bai – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. :- The ancestors of petitioners were said to be in possession of the land in dispute, as narrated in the present writ petition, which was a 'MUAFI LAND'. This land was resumed in July, 1963 under the provisions of Rajasthan Land Reforms and Resumption of Jagirs Act (hereinafter to be referred as Jagirs Act'). The petitioners sought declaration to the effect that on coming into force of Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter to be referred as Tenancy Act') they had acquired khatedari rights. The copy of the plaint is attached as annexure-1. The private respondents had denied the rights of the petitioners and also filed a counter suit. The suit of the petitioners was dismissed by the SDO Iklera, whereas the suit of Murti Mandir was decreed holding that Murti Mandir Gokul Chandramajee were khatedar of the said land and the petitioners were in possession without any authority of law. The decree of possession in favour of Murti Mandir and against the petitioners was passed. Copies of the respective judgments are attached as annexure-5 & 6. The Revenue Appellate Authority, Kota vide judgment dated 13.1.79 dismissed the appeal, copy of which is attached as annexure-7. The ap














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top