1. - This appeal is the glaring example of misuse and abuse of process of law at the instance of the appellant-plaintiff, whereby the appellant has not only taken the High Court and the trial court for a ride but has also misled the courts by suppressing the material facts for obtaining the ex-parte ad-interim orders against the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, tent amounting to playing fraud on Court.

2. The present appeal filed under Or. XLIII Rule 1(r) of C.P.C. arises out of the order dated 11.4.2012, passed by the Additional District Judge No. 9, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Jaipur,(hereinafter referred to as the trial court) in Civil Misc. Application No. 1/2011, whereby the trial court has rejected the said application of the appellant-plaintiff seeking temporary injunction against the respondents-defendants with costs of Rs. 1100/-. This Court had called for the record of the case from the trial court and also the record of the writ petition being No. 11970/2011, filed by the appellant earlier, which have been perused by the Court.

3. At the out-set, it is necessary to mention the chronological dates and events of the case, which have constrained the Court to come to the conclu