2002 Supreme(Raj) 1474
N.N.MATHUR, D.N.JOSHI
Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 4018/1998:Mr. Rajendra Mehta, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 4263/1998:Mr. K.N. Joshi, Advocate.
For the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 346/1999:Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. N.M. Lodha, Senior Central Government Counsel.
JUDGMENT
1. - By this judgment three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of Finance Act by which service offered by the Chartered Accountants, Real Estate Agents (Property Dealers) and the Architects have been brought under the tax-net, which is to be charged at 5% of the value of the taxable services provided by them are being disposed of. Since the question involved in all the three writ petitions is identical, all the petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The first writ petition being D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4018/1998 has been filed by the Jodhpur Chartered Accountants Society. The Society is aggrieved of levy of service tax on the persons belonging to the profession of Chartered Accountants. The second writ petition being D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4263/1998 has been filed by an Association of Property Dealers in Jodhpur known as Jodhpur Property Dealers Association. It is claimed that the members of the petitioner Association are doing property business without rendering any service to the customers. They simply introduce purchasers, sellers, if any body approa
Click Here to Read the rest of this document