2014 Supreme(Raj) 1182
ARUN BHANSALI
Umrao Devi alias Amrao Devi – Appellant
Versus
Hulas Mal Anr. – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Appellant:A.A. Bhansali, Advocate.
For the Respondent:D.R. Bhandari, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - This first appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.04.1982 passed by District Judge, Balotra, whereby, the suit filed by the respondents for declaration, injunction, possession and mesne profit has been partly decreed. The respondents-plaintiffs have preferred cross-objections under Order 41, Rule 22 CPC to the extent the trial court has declined the relief to them.
2. At the outset, it may be noticed that appellant No.1 has been described as Smt. Amrao Devi in the plaint; she has signed the written statement as Smt. Amrao Devi; in the statement as DW-1 she has been named as Umrao Devi but signed the same as Amrao Devi; in the title of the impugned judgment she has been described as Smt. Amrao Devi. However, the present first appeal has been filed indicating her in the title as Smt. Umrao Devi, however, the Vakalatnama has been signed as Amrao Devi, as such in the body of judgment the appellant No.1 has 2 been indicated as Smt. Amrao Devi and in the title as Smt. Umrao Devi alias Amrao Devi.
3. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : plaintiffs Hulas Mal and Manoj Kumar S/o Hulas Mal filed a suit on 04.02.1977 claiming that the plaintiffs were membe
Click Here to Read the rest of this document