Rajesh Balia, Actg. C.J.—This writ petition was preferred in 2005 in the circumstances we shall presently notice. After being heard by two learned Single Judges after admission, and once judgment was reserved but the petition was not ultimately decided and when interim relief was refused by the learned Single Judge on 01.03.2007 and directed the petition to be heard in due course, this Special Appeal No.292/2007 was preferred against the order dt. 01.03.2007.

2. Looking to the nature of the controversy and urgency of decision and looking to importance of the issue raised, on the request of both the learned counsel the Division Bench passed the following order on 30.08.2007:

“It is agreed by the learned Advocates appearing in this matter that the matter can be decided finally. Learned advocates for the respondents have stated before the Court that even though this appeal is filed against an interlocutory order of the learned Single Judge, this Court may decide the entire controversy arising in the matter so that the question can be thrashed out at the earliest as the point involved in the matter concerns many students and their future is also dependent on the decision of this Court in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document