SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1008

R.S.CHAUHAN
Jai Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
S.N. Shah, for Petitioners;
Javed Chaudhary, P.P., for State

Hon'ble CHAUHAN, J.—Aggrieved by the order dated 11.8.2010 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Jhunjhunu, whereby the learned Judge has framed the charge of offences under Section 304 IPC read with Section 34 IPC against the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3, and the charge of Section 304 IPC against petitioner No.4, and the charges under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against all the petitioners, the petitioners have approached this Court.

2. In brief, the fact of the case are that on 22.1.2010, the complainant, Inder Raj Singh, had lodged a written report with the Police Station Sadar, Jhunjhunu. According to the complainant, due to an old animosity, on 22.1.2010, the petitioners had abused the complainant on mobile. Thereafter, the petitioners came to his house and threw stones and bricks. When his father came out of the bathroom, petitioner No.4 threw a brick at him. His father as struck and died. Charge sheet was filed against the petitioners. Vide order dated 11.8.2009, the learned Judge has framed the charges, as men-tioned above, against the petitioners. Hence, this petition before this Court.































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top