2011 Supreme(Raj) 508
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Meenakshi Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Advocates Appeared
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Sr. Advocate with S.S. Sharma, S.K. Singodiya, Rajesh Kala, Rajeev Sogarwal, Gaurav Sharm and Sanjay Mehla, for Petitioners;
S.N. Kumawat, Addl. Advocate General and Ganesh Meena, Govt. Counsel, for Respondents
Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—All these writ petition shave been filed assailing the order of the Government dated 17.3.2011 pursuant to which the appointment orders of the petitioners dated 14.7.2010 were cancelled and their services were discontinued. The impugned order dated 17.3.2011 has been passed in compliance of the judgment of coordinate bench of this Court in Hari Singh and Others vs. R.P.S.C. and Ors. 2010(4) WLC (Raj.) 771. The single Bench by the aforesaid judgment decided as many as 12 writ petitions. The dispute was with regard to correctness of of the authors namely (1) Colonel Taud, (2) Badayuni, (3) Abdul Fazal and (4) Gopinath Sharma, has referred to the war of Haldi Ghati as "Khamnor ka Yudh". The coordinate bench of this Court was persuaded to allow the writ petitions on consideration of the fact that while three different authors have in their books mentioned that it was Abdul Fazal who has called the war of Haldi Ghati as Khamnor Ka Yudh and one of those books has even been approved by the Board of Secondary Education, Ajmer, there is only one author who has mentioned that it was Badayuni who has called the war of Haldi Ghati battle as Khamnor Ka Yudh. On the basis of th
Click Here to Read the rest of this document