RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE
Vinod Zutshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
2. These applications have been filed by the accused persons for grant of anticipatory bail in a matter where the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur had accepted the protest petition filed by the complainant and summoned the applicants by way of non-bailable warrants, after taking cognizance against them on 09.09.2011.
3. The case of the prosecution is that in the city of Jaipur, there is a lake known as Mansagar which is about 400 years old. The said lake is an important historical and tourist point wherein a heritage building, namely Jal Mahal is situated. It was constructed in Sixteenth Century by the erstwhile ruler of Jaipur Maharaja Shri Man Singh with a total area of 750 bighas. The State Government had given it on lease of one rupee to Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation for development of the lake Mansagar and Jal Mahal. In the year 2003, the State Government and the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation
Shreekanthiah Ramayya Munipalli & Anr. vs. State of Bombay (AIR 1955 SC 287) 5
Amrik Singh vs. State of Pepsu (AIR 1955 SC 309) 5
Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. ((2007) 12 SCC 1) 5
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Sheetla Sahai & Ors. ((2009) 8 SCC 617) 5
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ((2011) 1 SCC 694) 5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.