RANJAN GOGOI, P.SATHASIVAM
Bhau Ram – Appellant
Versus
Janak Singh – Respondent
2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 20.09.2010 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in R.S.A. No. 501 of 2009 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein.
3. Brief facts:
(a) One Shanker Lal owned and possessed several lands in District Shimla including the land in question. Originally the land in question was owned by Smt. Lari Mohansingh @ Madna Wati and was in occupation of Shankar Lal as a tenant. After coming into force of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1953, Shanker Lal, moved an application on 21.1.1957, for proprietary rights under Sec. 11 of the said Act before the Compensation Officer, Mahesu. In the meantime, Madna Wati sold the suit land to Panu Ram (defendant No.2) on 22.10.1960. Defendant No.2 purchased the said land as benami in the name of his wife Kamla Devi (defendant No.1), who was a minor at that time. After the sale of suit land, defendant No.1 through defendant No.2 was substituted as respondents in place of Madna Wati in the application pending before the Compensation Officer. During the pendency of
C. Natrajan vs. Ashim Bai ((2007) 14 SCC 183 = RLW 2008(2) 1077 (SC)) 8
Ram Prakash Gupta vs. Rajiv Kumar Gupta & Ors. ((2007) 10 SCC 59 = 2008(1) RLW 776 (SC)) 8
Hardesh Ores (P) Ltd. vs. Hede & Co. ((2007) 5 SCC 614) 8
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. & Ors. vs. Owners & Parties
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable & Ors. vs. Assistant Charity Commissioner & Ors. ((2004) 3 SCC 137) 8
Saleem Bhai & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ((2003) 1 SCC 557) 8
The Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.