K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, VIKRAMAJIT SEN
Mangat Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
2. The prosecution, in order to bring home the offences, examined PWs 1 to 7 and also produced various documents. On the side of defence, DWs 1 to 5 were examined and the accused appellant got himself examined as DW6. After the evidence was closed, the accused was questioned under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), who denied all the incriminating statements made against him. The trial Court, after appreciating the oral and documentary evidence, came to the conclusion that an offe
State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Jagdev Singh Talwandi ((1984) 1 SCC 596) 4
State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Surinder Kumar & Ors. ((1992) 1 SCC 489) 4
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh & Anr. vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. ((2004) 4 SCC 158) 4
Hans Raj vs. State of Haryana (2004) 12 SCC 257 26
Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal vs. State of Gujarat (2013) 10 SCC 48 27
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.