MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Gopal Krishana – Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. – Respondent
2. The brief and relevant facts giving rise to this criminal writ petition are that the petitioner No. 1 Gopal Krishana is an Electrical Engineer working in BSNL Department. He was initially appointed as JTO Bundi in BSNL and in Dec. 2008 promoted as Deputy Manager and transferred to Delhi. The marriage of the petitioner No. 1 was solemnized with the complainant, who is respondent No. 2 herein on 27.4.2003 as per Hindu rites. It has been alleged in the writ petition that there was no demand of dowry by the petitioners and petitioners 2 and 3 needed a good bride for their son. Due to wedlock one son Master Kushal born on 30.3.2004 and daughter was born on 4.10.2011. It is alleged in the writ petition that the petitioner No. 1 lost his valuable 11 years only in accommodation whereas behaviour of the complainant was deteriorated day to day. The complainant was taken by
Y. Abrahama Ajith vs. Inspector of Police
Ramesh vs. State of Tamil Nadu (AIR 2005 SC 1989) 3
Bhura Ram vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 2008 SC 2666) 3
Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhad (AIR 2010 SC 3363) 3
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1960 SC 866) 11
State of Karnataka vs. L. Muniswamy & Ors. ((1977) 2 SCC 699) 12
Madhu Limaye vs. State of Maharashtra ((1977) 4 SCC 551) 13
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. & Ors. vs. Mohd. Sharaful Haque & Anr. ((2005) 1 SCC 122) 16
Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. ((2007) 12 SCC 1) 17
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.