N.K. JAIN, J.

Heard the learned counsel for the accused-appellant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Instant appeal, under Section 374 Cr.P.C., has been preferred by the accused-appellant Vijendra questioning the correctness of the judgment and order dated 29.03.2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dausa(hereinafter referred to as 'the Trial Court') in Sessions Case No. 62/2004(State of Rajasthan Vs. Vijendra), whereby the learned Trial Court, while acquitting the accused-appellant under Section 325 read with Section 149 IPC, convicted and sentenced him as under:

NAME OF ACCUSED SECTION IMPRISONMENT

Vijendra S/o. Shri Laxman Lal 147 IPC To undergo six months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo 15 days additional rigorous imprisonment.

148 IPC To undergo one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo one month's additional rigorous imprisonment.

341 IPC To undergo one month's rigorous imprisonment.

323/149 IPC To undergo six months rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 200/-, in default of payment of fine to further