2014 Supreme(Raj) 265
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Pramati Edu. & Cultural Trust Vs. Union of India (Patnaik, J.)
HON'BLE R.M. LODHA, CJI.
HON'BLE A.K. PATNAIK, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.
HON'BLE DIPAK MISRA, J.
HON'BLE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, J.
Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust ® & Ors.
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
Writ Petition (C) Nos. 416 of 2012 WITH 152 & 1081 of 2013; 60, 95, 106, 128, 144, 145, 160 and 136 of 2014, decided on 06.05.2014
Headnote:(a) Constitution of India Art. 19, 21 and 15 — Validity of Article 15(5) of Constitution of India inserted by Constitution (Ninety third Amendment) Act, 2005 and Article 21-A of Constitution of India inserted by the Constitution (Eight Sixth Amendment) Act, 2002 — Validity of Article 15(5) so far as "private unaided" educational institutions — Held — Article 15(5) of the Constitution and Art 21-A of Constitution do not alter the basic structure of frame work of Constitution and are constitutionally valid. (Para 47)
¼d½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku] vuqPNsn 19] 21 o 15 & lafo/kku ¼frjkuoka la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2005 }kjk vUr%LFkkfir Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 15¼5½ dh vkSj lafo/kku ¼fN;klhoka la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e] 2002 }kjk vUr% LFkkfir Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 21-d dh fof/k ekU;rk & tgka rd ^^futh xSj lgk;rk izkIr** 'kS{kf.kd laLFkk,a gS] vuqPNsn 15¼5½ dh fof/k ekU;rk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 15¼5½ vkSj vuqPNsn 21-d lafo/kku ds vk/kkjHkwr <kaps dh lajpuk esa ifjorZu ugha djrs gS vr% os laoS/kkfud :i ls fof/k ekU; gSA ¼in la[;k 47½
(b) Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Sec. 12(2), 18(3) and Constitution of India, Art. 21-A — Validity of Act of 2009 — Held — The 2009 Act insofar it applies to minority schools, aided and unaided, covered under Art. 30(1) of the Constitution is ultra vires the Constitution — Art. 2009 is not ultra vires Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. (Para 47)
Writ petition filed on behalf of Muslim Minority School Manager's Association is allowed and writ petition filed on behalf of non-minority unaided educational institutions are dismissed.
¼[k½ ckydksa dks fu%'kqYd ,oa vfuok;Z f'k{kk dk vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 2009] /kkjk 12¼2½] 18¼3½ ,oa Hkkjr dk lafo/kku] vuqPNsn 21-d & 2009 ds vf/kfu;e dh fof/k ekU;rk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & 2009 dk vf/kfu;e tgka rd ;g vYila[;d fo|ky;ksa] lgk;rk izkIr o xSj lgk;rk izkIr laLFkkvksa ij ykxw gksrk gS] lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 30¼1½ ds rgr vko`r gksrk gS] og lafo/kku ds vf/kdkjkrhr gS & 2009 dk vf/kfu;e lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 19¼1½¼g½ ds vf/kdkjkrhr ugha gSA ¼in la[;k 47½
eqfLye vYila[;d Ldwy O;oLFkkid ,lksfl,'ku dh vksj ls nk;j ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh vkSj xSj vYila[;d xSj lgk;rk izkIr 'kS{kf.kd laLFkkvksa dh vksj ls nk;j ;kfpdk [kkfjt dhA
2. Clause (5) of Article 15 of the Constitution reads as follows:
“Nothing in this article or in sub-clause (g) of clause (1) of article 19 shall prevent the State from making any special provision, by law, for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes in so far as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of article 30.”
Clause (5) of Article 15 of the Constitution, therefore, enables the State to make a special provision, by law, for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes insofar as such special provisions relate to their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the State, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of Article 30 of the Constitution. The constitutional validity of clause (5) of Article 15 of the Constitution insofar as it enables the State to make special provisions relating to admission to educational institutions of the State and educational institutions aided by the State was considered by a Constitution Bench of this Court in Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India & Ors. ((2008) 6 SCC 1) and the Constitution Bench held in the aforesaid case that clause (5) of Article 15 is valid and does not violate the “basic structure” of the Constitution so far as it relates to the State-maintained institutions and aided educational institutions. In the aforesaid case, however, the Constitution Bench left open the question whether clause (5) of Article 15 was constitutionally valid or not so far as “private unaided” educational institutions are concerned, as such “private unaided” educational institutions were not before the Court. This batch of writ petitions has been filed by private unaided educational institutions and we are called upon to decide whether clause (5) of Article 15 of the Constitution so far as it relates to “private unaided” educational institutions is valid and does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
3. Article 21A of the Constitution reads as follows:
“21A. Right to education.--The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine.".
Thus, Article 21A of the Constitution, provides that the State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine. Parliament has made the law contemplated by Article 21A by enacting the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (for short ‘the 2009 Act’). The constitutional validity of the 2009 Act was considered by a three-Judge Bench of the Court in Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan vs. Union of India & Anr. ((2012) 6 SCC 1). Two of the three Judges have held the 2009 Act to be constitutionally valid, but they have also held that the 2009 Act is not applicable to unaided minority schools protected under Article 30(1) of the Constitution. In the aforesaid case, however,