2013 Supreme(Raj) 164
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Jaipur Bench
Bhagwat Singh & Ors. Vs. State & Ors. (Rafiq, J.)
HON'BLE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J.
Bhagwat Singh & Ors.
Versus
State & Ors.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1805 of 1995, decided on 18.12.2013
K.K. Mehrishi, Senior Advocate with Timan Singh, for Petitioners;
Zakir Hussain, Addl. Govt. Counsel for Respondents.
Headnote:Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agriculture Holdings Act, 1973, Secs. 15 — Determination of ceiling and surplus land — Petitioner had 104 standard acres land as on 25.2.1958 — Transferred 86 bigha 7.5 biswa land by registered gift deed dated 30.3.1968 and 45 bigha 5 biswa land by unregistered sale deed dated 17.7.1963 — Not recognised — Declared land as surplus — Held — Both the dates fall after 25.2.1958 with reference to Sec. 30-D and Sec. 30-E — Rightly held that transfers were intended to defeat the provisions of ceiling law and were, therefore, not recognisable — The period of limitation of six years has to be counted from the date of commencement of the Amending Act — Order of reopening of ceiling case was passed within the limitation prescribed u/S. 15(2) of the Act of 1979 — Computation of standard acres by Addl. Collector requires reconsideration — Matter remanded.
Writ petition allowed in part. (Para 18)
jktLFkku d`f"k tksrksa ij vf/kdre gncUnh vf/kfu;e] 1973] lhfyax o ljIyl Hkwfe dk vo/kkj.k & fnukad 25-2-1958 dks izkFkhZ ds ikl 104 LVS.MMZ ,dM+ Hkwfe Fkh & iaftd`r nku foys[k fnukafdr 30-3-1968 ds }kjk 86 ch?kk 7-5 fcLok Hkwfe o viaftd`r foØ; foys[k fnukafdr 17-7-1963 ds }kjk 45 ch?kk 5 fcLok Hkwfe vUrfjr dh & ekU;rk ugha nh & Hkwfe dks ljIyl ?kksf"kr fd;k & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & nksuksa gh rkjh[ksa /kkjk 30&Mh o /kkjk 30&bZ ds lanHkZ esa fnukad 25-2-1958 ds ckn vkrh gS & ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr djuk lgh Fkk fd vUrj.k dk vk'k; lhfyax dkuwu ds izko/kkuksa dks foQy djuk Fkk vr% os ekU;rk iznku fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha Fks &N% o"kZ dh ifjlhek vof/k dh x.kuk la'kksf/kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjEHk gksus dh frfFk ls djuh gksrh gS & lhfyax izdj.k iqu% [kksyus dk vkns'k 1979 ds vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 15¼2½ ds rgr fu/kkZfjr ifjlhek ds Hkhrj ikfjr fd;k x;k gS & vfrfjDr dysDVj }kjk LVs.MMZ ,dM+ dh x.kuk ij iqufoZpkj fd;s tkus dh t:jr gS & ekeyk izfrizsf"kr fd;kA
¼in la[;k 18½
;kfpdk va'kr% Lohdkj dhA
2. The writ petitioners have asserted that late Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji widow of late Shri Thakur Bhawani Singhji, Resident of Village Chandnoli, Tehsil Bonly, District Sawaimadhopur, had a chunk of agriculture land in the said village as also in village Bharthala, District Tonk. The total land area measured upto 104 standard acres. The SDO, Sawaimadhopur had earlier initiated the acquisition proceedings against the said Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji under the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agriculture Holdings Act, 1973 (for short 'the Act of 1973'), but the same was dropped by order dated 26.5.1975 as in his view no surplus land was found in her hands. It was thereafter that the State Government vide order dated 6.7.1983 reopened the case and remanded the matter back to the Additional Collector, Sawaimadhopur for fresh adjudication under Sec. 15(1) and 15(2) of the said Act. The Additional Collector by order dated 15.11.1988 determined 421 bighas 17 biswa of land in excess with late Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji for being acquired. This order was challenged before the Board of Revenue by the petitioners. The Board vide aforesaid judgement dated 3.1.1992 accepted their appeal and remanded the matter back to the Additional Collector, Sawaimadhopur for fresh determination. He thereupon issued fresh order in ceiling case No.1/92 on 7.7.1994 but did not recognise the transfer of land covered by registered gift dated 30.3.1968 admeasuring 86 bigha 7.5 biswa as valid transfer holding that it was executed with an intention to defeat the provisions of the Act of 1973. Regarding transfer of the Agriculture land admeasuring 45 bigha 5 biswa by unregistered sale deed dated 17.7.1963 and 10.3.1964 to Rameshwar and Bhanwar Singh respectively, it was held that this purchase cannot be treated as bona fide as neither the purchasers were agriculturists, now were the transfers made by registered sale deed.
3. According to the petitioners, Smt. Nand Bai was widow since childhood and was since then leading a miserable and starving life. Since Smt. Nand Bai became widow during her childhood, the aforesaid land was gifted to her so that she could maintain herself. Considering that Smt. Nand Bai was sister of the husband of Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji. Late Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji therefore gifted 86 bigha and 7.5 biswa land to Smt. Nand Bai, widow of late Shri Bhanwar Singhji by means of registered sale deed dated 30.3.1968 and actual physical possession was also transferred. Mutation No. 120 dated 1.2.1971 was entered by virtue of the registered gift deed dated 30.3.1968 in the name of Smt Nand Bai by Gram Panchayat Bhadoti. The certified copy of the mutation has been place on record. Smt. Nand Bai was not a family member of late Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji. She continued to deposit the land revenue till she expired in the year 1980. Maji Sahiba Sardar Kanwar Ranawatji expired in the year 1993. The present petitioners were substituted