ARUN BHANSALI
Jagdish Chandra Sen S/o Shri Ladu Ram Nai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
1. This writ petition and several other writ petitions, as indicated in the annexed Schedule, have been filed by the petitioners aggrieved against orders passed by the respondents, whereby, pursuant to their selection under provisions of Rule 6D of the Rajasthan Educational Subordinate Service Rules, 1971 (‘Rules of 1971’), they have been adjusted/posted as per the Schedule at various schools under the Education Department.
2. It is, inter alia, the case of the petitioners that they were initially appointed on the post of Teacher Gr.-III, which has now been re-designated as Teacher Gr.-III, Level-I or Level–II under the provisions of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (‘the Act of 1994’) and Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (‘the Rules of 1996’); services of the petitioners were confirmed/regularized under the provisions of the Act of 1994 & the Rules of 1996; it is alleged that though the petitioners were appointed and their services are governed by the Act of 1994 & the Rules of 1996, without their knowledge, their services are being transferred under the provisions of Rule 6D of the Rules of 1971 to the Education Department; the respondents took steps for changing the
H.L. Trehan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. : (1989) 1 SCC 764
Jawaharlal Nehru University v. Dr. K.S. Jawatkar & Ors. : AIR 1989 SC 1577
Kavi Raj & Ors. v. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. : (2013) 3 SCC 526.
Orissa Electrical Engineers’ Service Association v. State of Orissa & Ors. : AIR 1998 SC 760
Om Prakash Rana v. Swarup Singh Tomar & Ors. : AIR 1986 SC 1672
Palure Bhaskar Rao v. P. Ramaseshaiah & Ors. : AIR 2017 SC 1805
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.