SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S. PATHAK, CJI., SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.
Jawaharlal Nehru University, Appellant
Versus
Dr. K.S. Jawatkar and others, Respondents.
Civil appeal No. 2948 of 1984
Decided on 12-5-1989.
Advocates appeared
Mr. G. Ramaswami Addl Solicitor General, MR.S. C. Dhanda Mr. C. S. Vaidyanathan, Mr. P. Chowdhary MR.S. R. Sethia Advocates with him for Appellant Respondent No 1-in -person Mr. Girish Chandra, Ms. Sushma Relan and Mr. P. Chowdhary Advocates with him for Respondents.
Jawaharlal Nehru University Act, 1966 – Section 7(b),5(2) and 1(4) - Special leave - Services of staff - This is an appeal by special leave against a judgment of a Division Bench of High Court of Delhi in a Letters Patent Appeal upholding the judgment of a single Judge of High Court in a writ petition filed by first respondent for a declaration that he continues to be in the service of the Jawaharlal Nehru University - Jawaharlal Nehru University Act, 1966 sets forth as objects of Jawaharlal Nehru University "to disseminate and advance knowledge, wisdom and understanding by teaching and research and by example and influence of corporate life, and in particular the objects set out in the first Schedule - Powers of University extend to establishing within Union Territory of Delhi or outside that territory such Special Centres as may be necessary for the furtherance of its objects, to create such teaching, administrative and other posts as the University may deem necessary, and to make arrangements thereto, and to appoint or recognise persons as Professors, Readers or Lecturers or otherwise as teachers of University - Section 7(b) of Act declares that where University establishes and maintains any institution or body outside Union Territory of Delhi then powers and jurisdiction of University will extend to such institution or body subject to the rules and regulations of University within, whose jurisdiction institution or body is situate – Held, When Manipur University Act provides for transfer of the services of staff working at Centre of Post-graduate Studies, Imphal, to employment in University, it must be construed as a provision enabling such transfer of employment but only on the assumption that the employee concerned is a consenting party to such transfer - Position in law is clear, that no employee can be transferred, without his consent, from one employer to another - Consent may be express or implied - Court do not find it necessary to refer to any case law in support of this conclusion - Inasmuch as the transfer of Centre of Post-graduate Studies from the appellant University to Manipur University could not result in a transfer of employment of the respondent from one to the other, it must be concluded that the respondent continues in the employment of the appellant University - Transfer of the Centre of Postgraduate Studies to the Manipur University may be regarded as resulting in the abolition of post held by the respondent in appellant University - If the post held by him constitutes a class by itself, it is possible to say that he is surplus to requirements of the appellant University and is liable to be retrenched, But it appears that the respondent has been adjusted against a suitable post in the appellant University and, has been working there without break during pendency of this litigation, and court cannot, permit the appellant University to retrench him - In the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed - Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT
PATHAK, CJI.:— This is an appeal by special leave against a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in a Letters Patent Appeal upholding the judgment of a single Judge of the High Court in a writ petition filed by the first respondent for a declaration that he continues to be in the service of the Jawaharlal Nehru University.
2. The Jawaharlal Nehru University Act, 1966 sets forth as the objects of the Jawaharlal Nehru University "to disseminate and advance knowledge, wisdom and understanding by teaching and research and by the example and influence of corporate life, and in particular the objects set out in the first Schedule." The powers of the University extend to establishing within the Union Territory of Delhi or outside that territory such Special Centres as may be necessary for the furtherance of its objects, to create such teaching, administrative and other posts as the University may deem necessary, and to make arrangements thereto, and to appoint or recognise persons as Professors, Readers or Lecturers or otherwise as teachers of the University. Section 7(b) of the Act declares that where the University establishes and maintains any institution or body outside the Union Territory of Delhi then the powers and jurisdiction of the University will extend to such institution or body subject to the rules and regulations of the University within, whose jurisdiction the institution or body is situate.
3. On 21st September, 1970 the Additional Secretary, Ministry of Education and Youth Services wrote to the Vice-Chancellor of the University informing him of the intention of the Government of India to establish a Central University at Shillong to serve the needs of the North Eastern Region of India, and that in August, 1969, the University Grants Commission had approved the proposal of the Manipur Administration to have a Postgraduate Centre at Imphal under the auspices of the Gauhati University, and considering the fact that the proposed Central University for the Hill Areas was also intended to cater to the needs of Manipur, it would be appropriate, he said, that the Jawaharlal Nehru University should establish a Centre at Imphal also which could later be made over to the proposed new University to be established by the Centre. On 3rd October, 1970, a resolution was passed by the Executive Council of the Jawaharlal Nehru University agreeing with the proposal of the Ministry of Education to set up an Institute of Postgraduate Studies at Imphal. A committee was set up to study the problems connected with the setting up of such an Institute and to submit concrete proposals in that regard. On 12th June, 1971, the Executive Council of the University recorded their agreement in principle to the proposal of the Ministry of Education to set up an Institute of Post-graduate Studies at Imphal and noted that the committee had submitted its report. Then on 12th June, 1971, the Executive Council passed a resolution that a Centre of Post-graduate Studies be set up at Imphal under S. 5(2) of the Jawaharlal Nehru University, Act.
4. On 27th January, 1971, the appellant University informed the respondent that he had been selected for the post of Research Assistant in the Department of South Eastern Studies, School of International Studies of the University, that the appointment would be temporary for a period of six months and his services could be terminated on one months notice on either side. On 25th April, 1973, the term of temporary appointment as Research Assistant in the School of International Studies was extended by the appellant University for a further period of six months with effect from 4th June, 1973. Thereafter, by letter dated 29th November, 1973 the Vice-Chancellor of the appellant University offered the respondent the post of Associate Fellow in the Post-graduate Studies Centre of the University at Imphal for a period of one year in the first instance, the appointment being made on ad hoc basis, and h
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.