SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Raj) 1088

VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Consented by the counsel for the parties, the batch of writ applications has been taken up together, at this stage, for final disposal by this common order, in view of the identicalness of questions of facts and law raised.

2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the essential skeletal material facts are: that the State-respondents vide advertisement dated 13th April, 2018, invited applications from eligible candidates for appointment to the post of Safai Karamchari withdrawing the earlier advertisement dated 25th May, 2012 and 31st May, 2012, to the extent of appointments not made, even after completion of selection process. However, the candidature of the participating candidates of recruitment of 2012, was to be considered in the new selection process initiated vide advertisement dated 13th April, 2018, allowing relaxation of age. The above noted writ applications have been instituted assailing the recruitment process initiated vide advertisement dated 13th April, 2018, on various grounds. In view of the pleadings of the parties; the controversy projected in the writ a


















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top