IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
Khushmita Nagoura – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2167 of 2022
Decided On : 04-04-2022
Admission - M.Sc.(Med.) Biochemistry Course - Ordinance 278-F - Misrepresentation - Eligibility Criteria - Misrepresentation in Application Form - Provisional Admission - Cancellation of Admission
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner secured admission in the M.Sc.(Med.) Biochemistry Course at Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur, but her admission was cancelled by the college for not meeting the eligibility criteria of having less than 60% marks in B.Sc. (Biology with Chemistry and Zoology). The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the cancellation and continue her studies.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner had made a false declaration in her application form, misrepresenting her eligibility for the course. The court held that the admission was purely provisional and subject to enrollment by the university, and the petitioner's admission was rightly cancelled upon finding her ineligible.
Issues: Misrepresentation in the application form, eligibility criteria for admission, provisional admission, cancellation of admission
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the petitioner's misrepresentation in the application form regarding her eligibility for the course cannot be countenanced on the ground of equity or sympathy, as it may prejudice other eligible candidates. The court also highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory rules for admission and the consequences of misrepresentation.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the cancellation of the petitioner's admission in the M.Sc.(Med.) Biochemistry Course was upheld.
JUDGMENT :
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
1) That letter dated 22/01/2022 (annexure No. 10) issued by the respondent No. 4, shall be quashed and set-aside.
2) That respondents may kindly be directed to allow petitioner to continue her studies for M.Sci (Med) Biochemistry course 2020-21 at S.N. Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals, Jodhpur.
3) That any other appropriate order or direction by which this Hon'ble court considers must and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
4) Costs the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."
2. Brief facts of the case are that pursuant to the Notification dated 3.8.2021 issued by the respondent No. 2 - the Convenor, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, M.Sc.(Med.) Entrance Examination, 2020, the petitioner has submitted her application form and she was permitted to appear in the M.Sc.(Med) Entrance Examination, 2020. The entrance test was conducted on 7.8.2021 and the petitioner has passed the aforesaid entrance test. Thereafter, respondent No. 3 - the Chairman, M.Sc.(Med.) Counseling Board, Academic Session 2020-21, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, Jaipur has issued a provisional allotment letter in favour of the petitioner on 18.9.2021 and she was asked to report at Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur between 17.9.2021 to 24.9.2021. Pursuant to that, the petitioner had reported at Dr. S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur and she was granted admission, however, her admission was cancelled by respondent No. 4 - the Principal and Controller, Dr. S.N. Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals, Jodhpur vide order dated 22.1.2022 for the reason that petitioner is not meeting the eligibility criteria for admission in the M.Sc.(Med.) Biochemistry Course, 2020-21.
3. Being aggrieved with the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the reliefs, which are quoted in the earlier part of this order.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that action of the respondent No. 4 of cancelling admission of the petitioner vide impugned order dated 22.1.2022 is absolutely illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice. It is further submitted that the petitioner, in her application form (Annex.2), has given all the information and taking into consideration the same, she was allowed to appear in the entrance test. It is also submitted that the petitioner cleared the entrance test and on being figured in the merit list, she was given admission in the respondent - medical college and she had undergone studies for about three months. Learned counsel has argued that there is no fault on the part of the petitioner as she had disclosed all the information about her and after considering the same, she was provided admission in the respondent - medical college. It is further argued that there was no misrepresentation on the part of the petitioner and even if it is assumed that the petitioner was not having eligibility for admission in the M.Sc.(Med.) Course, her admission cannot be cancelled as she has not got admission on the basis of any misrepresentation.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Hon'ble Court and various High Courts in catena of decisions have held that once admission is granted to a student in any course, the same cannot be cancelled.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajendra Prasad Mathur v. Karnataka University and Another & Vijay Kumar Sharma v. Karnataka University and Another, report
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Virendra Kumar Jayantibhai Patel
Council for Indian School Certificate Examination v. Isha Mittal and Ors.
K. Sujatha v. Marathwada University and Others
Nitesh Kumar Goyal and Others v. Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner and Another
Admissions should not be cancelled without any wrongdoing or default on the part of the candidate, and the responsibility of the institution in granting admissions is emphasized.
In cases of erroneous admissions, the institution cannot cancel admissions after the course has started if the candidates were not at fault, and the principle of estoppel applies.
Meritorious candidates who have pursued their legal right expeditiously without delay and have been denied admission to MBBS Course illegally or irrationally by the authorities for no fault of theirs....
Candidates must strictly adhere to eligibility criteria as outlined in the university's prospectus, and institutions are justified in cancelling admissions if these criteria are not met.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Regulation 17(a)-2(iii) and the court's reliance on precedents to allow the issuance of the consolidated marksheet of M.Sc. (Com....
The court affirmed the principle that students should not be penalized for institutional errors in admissions when they are qualified, allowing them to continue their studies.
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.