VIJAY BISHNOI
Khushmita Nagoura – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
1) That letter dated 22/01/2022 (annexure No. 10) issued by the respondent No. 4, shall be quashed and set-aside.
2) That respondents may kindly be directed to allow petitioner to continue her studies for M.Sci (Med) Biochemistry course 2020-21 at S.N. Medical College and Associated Group of Hospitals, Jodhpur.
3) That any other appropriate order or direction by which this Hon'ble court considers must and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
4) Costs the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."
2. Brief facts of the case are that pursuant to the Notification dated 3.8.2021 issued by the respondent No. 2 - the Convenor, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, M.Sc.(Med.) Entrance Examination, 2020, the petitioner has submit
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. Virendra Kumar Jayantibhai Patel
Council for Indian School Certificate Examination v. Isha Mittal and Ors.
K. Sujatha v. Marathwada University and Others
Nitesh Kumar Goyal and Others v. Maharaja Ganga Singh University, Bikaner and Another
Admissions should not be cancelled without any wrongdoing or default on the part of the candidate, and the responsibility of the institution in granting admissions is emphasized.
In cases of erroneous admissions, the institution cannot cancel admissions after the course has started if the candidates were not at fault, and the principle of estoppel applies.
Meritorious candidates who have pursued their legal right expeditiously without delay and have been denied admission to MBBS Course illegally or irrationally by the authorities for no fault of theirs....
Candidates must strictly adhere to eligibility criteria as outlined in the university's prospectus, and institutions are justified in cancelling admissions if these criteria are not met.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Regulation 17(a)-2(iii) and the court's reliance on precedents to allow the issuance of the consolidated marksheet of M.Sc. (Com....
The court affirmed the principle that students should not be penalized for institutional errors in admissions when they are qualified, allowing them to continue their studies.
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.