Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, AMIT BANSAL
Alok Ranjan – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the petitioner's application and difficulties. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. arguments for admission based on disability. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. respondent's arguments against petitioner's admission. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. court's analysis regarding eligibility based on disability regulations. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 5. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 57 , 58) |
JUDGMENT
D.N. Patel, C.J. This petition has been preferred with the following prayers:
"a. issue appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby quashing the MCI gazette notification no.mci-18(1)/2018-med./187262 dated 05.02.2019/14.5.2019 for admission to medical courses in all India quota, restriction be removed for disabled person who has been stopped for getting admission in MBBS Course, not eligible because of involvement of right upper limbs;
b. issue of appropriate writ, order or direction in thenature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent no. 2 to 4 to g
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
