IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Kuldeep Mathur, JJ.
Kailash Ram S/o Shri Daya Ram - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Energy, Secretariat, Jaipur - Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12649 of 2022
Decided On : 01-09-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Electricity Act, 2003 – Section 68, 164 – Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – Petitioners herein have approached this Court through this writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India branding same to be a Public Interest Litigation writ petition with prayers – Held, Electricity transmission line is being laid in furtherance of a notification issued by appropriate Government in this regard, and as said notification is not even called into question, this Court would be loathe to question the validity thereof – Furthermore, alignment of overhead line having been decided by competent authority after following due process of law, there is no reason to interfere therein while exercising power of judicial review conferred upon this Court by Article 226 of Constitution of India – Writ petition dismissed.
ORDER :
The petitioners herein have approached this Court through this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India branding the same to be a Public Interest Litigation writ petition with the following prayers:-
(2) That the respondents may further be directed to shift the tower proposed in Khasra No.709 of Village Jeewana, Tehsil Sayala, District Jalore just at a distance of 200 feet in the same land towards the land bearing Khasra No.710. As the same would at all not disturbe the entire alignment of the proposed 132 KV supply line between GSS Khokha to GSS Jeewana.”
2. Shri P.R. Singh Jodha, learned counsel representing the petitioners, vehemently and fervently contended that 132 KV Overhead Electricity Line is being installed through the Khasra No.1332/707, which may cause serious threat to lives of the villagers of Village Jeewana and their livestock and thus, a direction be given to restrain the respondents from erection of the supply line in question and further to change the alignment thereof.
3. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the submissions advanced by Shri Singh and have gone through the material placed on record.
4. Suffice it to say that laying of the Overhead Electricity Line is being undertaken by the respondents by taking recourse to the powers conferred under Section 68 read with Section 164 of The Electricity Act, 2003. Shri Jodha, during the course of arguments, candidly conceded that Gazette notification in this regard, has been issued long back and the same is not under challenge in this writ petition. Nevertheless, his fervent contention was that as many villagers’ own lands directly underneath the over hung of the questioned supply line, it would pose a great threat to the lives of the petitioners and their likes and so also, to the livestock which grazes on these lands.
5. We have gone through the various title documents placed on record of the writ petition. It is clearly evident form a bare perusal of these documents that the entire chunk of agricultural land in question was owned by one Prakash Dewasi, who seems to have got it converted into Abadi category and thereafter, divided it into plots, sold the same to various persons between the months of November, 2021 to April, 2022. As the Gazette notification authorizing the laying of the overhead electricity supply line has not been placed on record, it can be safely presumed that all these transactions must have been made after the issuance thereof.
6. Apparently, thus, the instant writ petition seems to be nothing but a ploy of the land holders to somehow or the other, get the alignment of the Overhead Electricity Line changed.
7. This very controversy was considered in detail by Hon’ble the Gujarat High Court in the case of Gujarat State Energy Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Ratilal Maganji Brahmbhatt (Barot) reported in AIR 2021 CC 1044 and the similar challenge laid by the land holder was repelled in the following manner:-
58.2 As per Clause (c) to Section 10, the authority can exercise its powers in respect of the property
The court upheld the statutory authority to lay electricity lines, prioritizing public interest over individual objections.
The conferment of powers of Telegraph Authority under Section 164 of the Electricity Act does not require a hearing of objections from affected persons before exercising powers under the Telegraph Ac....
The authority under the Indian Telegraph Act has the right to lay transmission lines on private property, prioritizing public interest and following due process, including compensation for any damage....
The court upheld the validity of the District Magistrate's order permitting the laying of a transmission line, affirming that adequate notice and opportunity were provided to affected farmers, thus a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.