Back
Suman Kumari D/o Shri Devkaran – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Department Of Agriculture – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant intra court appeal has been preferred by the appellant Ms. Suman Kumari being aggrieved of the order dated 29.03.2022 passed by learned Single Bench whereby, the writ petition preferred by the petitioner (a) Seeking to question revised answer key issued by the Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board for recruitment on the post of Agriculture Supervisor pursuant to the advertisement dated 05.02.2021; (b) Seeking direction for preparation of a fresh answer key for considering objections raised by the writ petitioner for the disputed questions; (c) To ignore the erroneous answers based on the material produced by the writ petitioner; (d) re-evaluate the answer sheets and issuance of a fresh select list of provisionally selected candidates, was rejected.
2. The writ petition (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4011/2022) preferred by the petitioner was rejected by the learned Single Bench by recording concession of the counsel that the controversy involved in the writ petition was squarely covered by the ratio of the judgment in the case of Phoosgir & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17265/2021) and other connected matt
Limited scope of judicial review in matters involving expert committees' opinions and decisions
The scope of interference by the Court in the decisions of expert examining bodies in the field of education or public employment is necessarily limited, and the Court should be very slow in interfer....
The court established that an expert committee's evaluation of answer keys in recruitment processes is presumptively correct, allowing judicial restraint unless glaring errors are evident.
Courts should defer to the opinion of subject experts in public examinations and should not interfere with the examination process unless there is a glaring mistake that is totally apparent without a....
Limited judicial review and reluctance to interfere with the decisions of expert bodies in matters of limited expertise, as established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court's principles
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
