Tejmal S/o Juwana vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 593

Tejmal S/o Juwana – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. R.R. Goyal, Mr. B.R. Choudhary.
For the Respondent: Mr. Javed Choudhary.

JUDGMENT :

BIRENDRA KUMAR, J.

1. All the eight appellants faced trial in Sessions Case No. 31/2013 arising out of FIR No. 27/2013 registered with Police Station Hindoli for offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323/149 and 302/149 IPC. On trial before the learned Sessions Judge, the appellants were found guilty vide impugned judgment dated 11.06.2015 and on the same day, the learned trial Judge passed the following sentences:

U/s 147 IPC	6 months rigorous imprisonment
U/s 148 IPC	one year rigorous imprisonment
U/s 341 IPC	15 days simple imprisonment
U/s 323/149 IPC	3 months rigorous imprisonment
U/s 302/149 IPC	Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 2,000/- in default six months simple imprisonment

Sentences are to run concurrently.

2. The prosecution examined altogether 19 witnesses and 61 documents were exhibited from Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.61. Among the prosecution witnesses, only two are eye-witnesses. They are PW-6 Satyanarayan and PW-16 Devraj. The informant of the case PW-9 Bhimraj is not an eye-witness of the occurrence.

3. According to the First Inform

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 593

Tejmal S/o Juwana – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Tejmal S/o Juwana – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent