SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 685

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Deen Dayal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V.K. Bhadu.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, P.P., Mr. Manish Dadhich.

ORDER :

1. In the wake of instant surge in COVID – 19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in the Court, for the safety of all concerned.

2. This criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs :

    “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Revision Petition may kindly be allowed. The order dated 03.03.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangaria in Criminal Revision No.38/2009 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangaria dated 24.07.2009 may kindly be restored.”

3. Brief facts of the case as placed before this Court by the learned counsel for the complainant/petitioner are that the complainant/petitioner submitted a complaint before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sangariya on 06.10.2008, levelling allegations against the accused-respondents regarding assaulting the complainant/petitioner as well as hurling caste based abuses against him; the same was sent by the learned court under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for invest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top