Hukma Ram S/o. Rawat Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 686

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Hukma Ram S/o. Rawat Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vinod Sharma, Mr. D.S. Udawat.
For the Respondent: Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, P.P., Mr. B. Ray Bishnoi, Mr. Tanay Jain.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. The appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 05.08.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Pali in Sessions Case No.32/2014 (C.I.S. No.815/2014) :

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Section 147 IPC	2 Years’ R.I.
Section 148/120B IPC	3 Years’ R.I.
Section 449/120B IPC	7 Years’ R.I.	Rs.10,000/-	2 Months’ Addl. R.I.
Section 302/149 R/w 120B IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.50,000/-	5 Months’ Addl. R.I.
All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of their conviction and sentences, the appellants have preferred these appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Since both these appeals arise out of a common Judgment, they have been heard and are being decided together.

4. Facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeals are noted hereinbelow:

5. A written report (Ex.P/9) was submitted by Mahendra Singh (PW-4) to the SHO, Police Station Jaitaran, District Pali on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 686

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANIHukma Ram S/o. Rawat Ram – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Hukma Ram S/o. Rawat Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent