Ramswaroop @ Chotaka vs State of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(All) 230

Ramswaroop @ Chotaka – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajiv Lochan Shukla, K.K. Pandey and K.K. Mishra
For the Respondent: Manju Thakur, A.G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

Heard Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla assisted by Sri K.K. Pandey and Sri K.K. Mishra, learned counsels for the appellants and Smt. Manju Thakur, the learned AGA for the State.

1. These criminal appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.3.2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.8, Fatehpur in Sessions Trial No. 309 of 2006, arising out of Case Crime No.50/2006, State vs. Darshrath and others, under Sections 302/34 IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Ashothar, District Fatehpur, convicting and sentencing the accused-appellants Dashrath @ Badka, Ramswaroop @ Chotka, Suresh and Shivpersona @ Bantwa for life imprisonment and fine of Rs.7000/-and in default of payment of fine, they have to further undergo imprisonment of 1 year and sentencing them under Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act for imprisonment of 3 months and all the sentences will run concurrently. Further accused-appellant Ramswaroop @ Chotka was also convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act in S.T. No.312 of 2006, arising out of Case Crime No.64/2006, State vs. Ramswaroop, P.S. Ashothar, District Fatehpur and sentenced for rigor