Bhagirath vs State Of Rajasthan - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 783

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 783

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALI
Bhagirath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Manish Sisodia, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Yogendra Singh
For the Respondent: Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, Mr. Pawan Singh Bhati, on behalf of Mr. I.R. Choudhary

JUDGMENT :

MEHTA, J.

1. These three appeals are directed against the judgment dated 25.03.1992 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Churu in Sessions Case No.33/1990, whereby accused Mukan Singh, Nirana Ram, Shankar Lal, Girdhari Singh, Shyamla, Omla and Bhagirath have been convicted and sentenced as below :-

Offence for which convicted	Sentence and fine awarded
Section 304 Part I read with Section 149 IPC	Five years’ rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.500/-
Section 325 read with Section 149 IPC	One year’s rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.100/-
Section 323 read with Section 149 IPC	Six months’ rigorous imprisonment
Section 148 IPC	One year’s rigorous imprisonment
Section 447 IPC	Three months’ rigorous imprisonment

2. It is relevant to note here that the accused appellants were charged for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 307 read with Section 149 IPC. However, the trial court while toning down the offence under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, convicted the accused a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 783

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALIBhagirath – AppellantVersusState Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALI
Bhagirath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent