DINESH MEHTA
Sheetal Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioners have approached this Court with a grievance that the petitioners are being harassed in the name of investigation in relation to FIR No.524 dated 07.07.2022, registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar (Bhilwara), District Bhilwara, which has been registered against Harsh and Vinod, partners of M/s Shyam Textiles.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has produced documents on record evincing that they have purchased certain goods from M/s Shyam Textiles, partnership firm of said accused persons (Vinod and Harsh).
3. It is stated that these goods were purchased under duly issued GST bills and payments' have been made through bank, which facts are evident from tax invoices and bank accounts (page No.29-80) of the paper book.
4. Learned counsel has raised a serious concern that petitioners' bank accounts have also been frozen by the Investigating Officer, without any authority.
5. While maintaining that the petitioners are not involved in any sort of offence, learned counsel argues that the petitioners cannot be enroped in such process and their bank accounts cannot be frozen, even if the firm M/s Shyam Textiles and its partners have cheated the complainant.
6. Mr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.